Nathan peterman was better then his stats

[GOATeric14berry]

Lets start with the first fumble he had. It was a missed assignment by the RT. The next fumble he had was guess what another missed assignment by eather RB or RT. He even made better reads in the read options then worley. yes he did throw two interceptions but so did worley.

 

[govols/cc]

Troll. Peterman sucks in every facet. Blew his one & only shot. If he doesn't play we most likely win. Oh yea he's slow as hell too. Not sure how he's more mobile than Worley.

 

[JonWard]

Not saying much

 

[GOATeric14berry]

Troll. Peterman sucks in every facet. Blew his one & only shot. If he doesn't play we most likely win.

No worley would of started.

 

[TennesseeOrange]

Wow. We're really digging deep now.

 

[TrueOrange]

"then his stats"

 

[smokeyvols]

Peterman and Worley both suck!!! Plan and simple!!!!!

 

[volatil]

When I read this, I thought "Damn how bad were his stats?"

 

[GOATeric14berry]

Rewatch the game and you will see all of what I said is true

 

[Section KK]

Lets start with the first fumble he had. It was a missed assignment by the RT. The next fumble he had was guess what another missed assignment by eather RB or RT. He made better reads in the read options then worley. yes he did throw two interceptions but so did worley.

I want to agree, because I like Peterman, but ...

First fumble - Peterman's fault, should have pulled ball and run left.

Second fumble - LT couldn't block his man (not RT or RB), Peterman should feel the pressure enough to protect ball.

First INT - Should have been intercepted by first guy, terrible throw right at defender

Second INT - Likely related to thumb injury


Peterman will be back; he's better than this. Sometimes, you play one of the best defenses in the country in your first start and you do badly.

 

[jeffmcflurry27]

Lets start with the first fumble he had. It was a missed assignment by the RT. The next fumble he had was guess what another missed assignment by eather RB or RT. He made better reads in the read options then worley. yes he did throw two interceptions but so did worley.

5 yards passing. I say again, 5 yards passing. I have still yet to see Worley throw the ball straight up in the air without being touched. Worley also manages the game better. Notice how the ball actually moved when he was in. Peterman just isn't ready yet.

On a side note, only one of Worleys picks were really his fault, even though UF knew he was going to have to pass on every play with 6 minutes left in the game. The second was a prayer thrown up with 12 seconds left.

 

[photovol]

Sorry, but Nathan was the "Goat" on Saturday and no excuse will make up for his play.

 

[govols/cc]

I want to agree, because I like Peterman, but ...

First fumble - Peterman's fault, should have pulled ball and run left.

Second fumble - LT couldn't block his man (not RT or RB), Peterman should feel the pressure enough to protect ball.

First INT - Should have been intercepted by first guy, terrible throw right at defender

Second INT - Likely related to thumb injury


Peterman will be back; he's better than this. Sometimes, you play one of the best defenses in the country in your first start and you do badly.

You know what they say about excuses....

 

[Section KK]

You know what they say about excuses....

I'm not making excuses for anything .. he played badly, but he's better than he played yesterday.

Don't understand comment

 

[orangeluvr]

Lets start with the first fumble he had. It was a missed assignment by the RT. The next fumble he had was guess what another missed assignment by eather RB or RT. He even made better reads in the read options then worley. yes he did throw two interceptions but so did worley.

Which game you talkin bout , musta missed it.

 

[GrowVol]

Peterman had stats????

 

[Air_Force_Vol27]

I spit up my drink reading the thread title.

 

[Rifleman]

Rewatch the game and you will see all of what I said is true

Unless I somehow end up a hostage in a terrorist prison camp and they find out how to break me, I will never re-watch that game.

 

[govols/cc]

I'm not making excuses for anything .. he played badly, but he's better than he played yesterday.

Don't understand comment

You're as good as you play. He didnt play badly he was terrible in every way. He was lost in every way. Had no clue what he was doing. There's no silver lining.

 

[volatil]

Unless I somehow end up a hostage in a terrorist prison camp and they find out how to break me, I will never re-watch that game.

That's in The Geneva Convention

 

[DERELICK_MY_VOLS]

Was this game on a PS3 or Xbox perhaps:dunno:

 

[roosterjbh]

Sorry, but Nathan was the "Goat" on Saturday and no excuse will make up for his play.

Doesn't the term "Goat" usually stand for the greatest of all time?

 

[DERELICK_MY_VOLS]

Doesn't the term "Goat" usually stand for the greatest of all time?

Unless referring to the animal used in sacrifices....goats....lambs....Peterman :rofl:

 

[roosterjbh]

Unless referring to the animal used in sacrifices....goats....lambs....Peterman :rofl:

Ah,yea maybe.Its been a very lazy sunday. Although I've never really heard the term sacrificial goat before lol.

 

[TrueOrange]

Doesn't the term "Goat" usually stand for the greatest of all time?

GOAT stands for greatest of all time when abbreviated, usually on the message board


goat means the guy who's poor play or mistakes are felt to have cost the team the game, who the fans blame for the loss; the guy the fans joke about saying that "he's going to have a long ride home" or "no one's going to be sitting next to / talking to him on the bench / on the ride back home"



An example would be: in 2004, James Wilhoit went from goat (having missed the extra point that seemed like it would cause TN to lose to UF by a point) to hero (by making the last second FG to win the game)