National Enquirer: Sarah Palin's infidelity

#1
notverycrucial

notverycrucial

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
1,473
Likes
0
#1
WORLD EXCLUSIVE: SARAH PALIN'S SECRET LOVER REVEALED! - Celebrity News | Gossip - National Enquirer

In a world exclusive The NATIONAL ENQUIRER names GOP VP Candidate Sarah Palin's secret lover!

No less than three members of the man’s family including one by sworn affidavit have claimed that Sarah Palin engaged in an extramarital affair with hus*band Todd’s former business partner, Brad Hanson.

These sources have named Hanson as Palin’s secret love, and say their affair nearly wrecked both their marriages.
Click to expand...

I doubt this will have any serious impact, but it does add to a list of distractions for Palin-McCain. If anything, it will cause another backlash against media elites picking on Sarah Palin. For the record, I don't care if she had an affair. Just wondering what y'all think?
 
#4
#4
notverycrucial said:
WORLD EXCLUSIVE: SARAH PALIN'S SECRET LOVER REVEALED! - Celebrity News | Gossip - National Enquirer



I doubt this will have any serious impact, but it does add to a list of distractions for Palin-McCain. If anything, it will cause another backlash against media elites picking on Sarah Palin. For the record, I don't care if she had an affair. Just wondering what y'all think?
Click to expand...

I seem to remember that you were upset with me for posting about something I had seen on the net that you didn't feel had credibility. Now you start a thread with info from the National Enquirer. Classy.
 
#6
#6
And how many women did Bill Clinton bag during his marriage??? This is really much less of a concern. The percentage of people who have extramarital affairs is staggering. Obviously, if it is true, she and her husband worked out their problems and got the ship righted again. What people do inn their personal lives, as long as it's not illegal, should have minimal impact. What they do professionally should be what matters. And on a side note, if I remember correctly, Alaska has a clause in their constitution making what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home, or any other private location, to be fine and dandy. You guys who are making a fuss over this are just jealous she didn't want you to be the "other man".
 
#7
#7
superdave1984 said:
And how many women did Bill Clinton bag during his marriage??? This is really much less of a concern. The percentage of people who have extramarital affairs is staggering. Obviously, if it is true, she and her husband worked out their problems and got the ship righted again. What people do inn their personal lives, as long as it's not illegal, should have minimal impact. What they do professionally should be what matters. And on a side note, if I remember correctly, Alaska has a clause in their constitution making what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home, or any other private location, to be fine and dandy. You guys who are making a fuss over this are just jealous she didn't want you to be the "other man".
Click to expand...


I don't remember Clinton getting this kind of support when he had an affair.
 
#9
#9
615 Vol said:
I don't remember Clinton getting this kind of support when he had an affair.
Click to expand...

He was doing it in the white house while trouble was brewing in the world. I don't care that he had affairs (I could even understand, after sleeping with a cold witch for many years:)) but when your president your time could be better spent focusing on the nations problems.
 
#11
#11
KB5252 said:
He was doing it in the white house while trouble was brewing in the world. I don't care that he had affairs (I could even understand, after sleeping with a cold witch for many years:)) but when your president your time could be better spent focusing on the nations problems.
Click to expand...

Like Obama said, the President should be able to handle multiple task at the same time. :)
 
#14
#14
615 Vol said:
Like Obama said, the President should be able to handle multiple task at the same time. :)
Click to expand...

Well it was pretty obvious some things were not dealt with because he was juggling low class women!:) (If there is anyone who will argue that these women were not lacking in class it would make my day)
 
#16
#16
Pre-Obama days Clinton was the great thing. I remember flipping thru the channels one time and seeing Billy and some black guy giving each other the pound(handshake). i busted out laughing watching it, it was ridiculous
 
#17
#17
BigPapaVol said:
I invite you to look at the press coverage. Remember the "vast right wing conspiracy" interview and how that was received on the air?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Well according to a post I just read about Palin, it should have been his business. If that's true, why did they seize the opportunity to try and impeach him? I know hypocrisy is not partisan but it's funny that the same people that were calling for Clinton's head are now saying to leave Palin alone and mind your business.
 
#19
#19
615 Vol said:
Well according to a post I just read about Palin, it should have been his business. If that's true, why did they seize the opportunity to try and impeach him? I know hypocrisy is not partisan but it's funny that the same people that were calling for Clinton's head are now saying to leave Palin alone and mind your business.
Click to expand...

The reason they tried to impeach him had everything to do with our president perjuring himself while under oath during questioning about Lewinski.

And yes repubs seized the opportunity but it was handed them on a silver platter, multiple times.
 
Last edited:
#23
#23
KB5252 said:
The reason they tried to impeach him had everything to do with our president perjuring himself while under oath during questioning about Lewinski.

And yes repubs seized the opportunity but it was handed them on a silver platter, multiple times.
Click to expand...

I agree, he didn't do himself any favors. Besides, I have no idea if Palin had an affair and really don't care.
 
#25
#25
615 Vol said:
Well according to a post I just read about Palin, it should have been his business. If that's true, why did they seize the opportunity to try and impeach him?
Click to expand...
Surely you recall that they didn't impeach him, even though he clearly lied under oath. The resistance came from somewhere. The dems defended their known philanderer at every turn. Hillary even tried to pretend that she had no idea.

I thought the whole charade was ridiculous at the time, but it's our two party system.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top