rjd970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 24,303
- Likes
- 24,344
Interesting read on the Bama machine in Tuscaloosa:
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...ing-to-limit-the-size-of-your-football-staff/
I'm kind of torn on the NCAA regulating this. On one hand, I think this creates an unfair competitive advantage for some programs. If you have an army of analysts pouring over recruiting tapes and doing background, then the main assistant coaches are able to focus on coaching. At smaller programs, even in power 5 conferences, there is a competitive disadvantage when a single coach is doing the same job being covered by multiple "analysts" at another. Basically, some schools are able to outspend other schools before they even meet on the field.
On the other hand, it isn't against the rules. If other schools want to win then pony up the money and resources to make this happen. It's simply working within the rules. I also see some legal liability here. What happens when the OSUs, Notre Dame's, and Bama's have to fire people currently employed as analysts? Seems to me the affected individuals would have a legal case against the NCAA.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...ing-to-limit-the-size-of-your-football-staff/
Former Alabama offensive consultant Eric Kiesau provided a comprehensive inside look at the operation last year.
"It's a whole other section of the building," Kiesau told me. "There are guys, like students, who played football in high school and love Alabama. They watch recruiting film all day long. Then you have your top guys. They start making cut-ups so the assistant coaches are more efficient with their time."
The enduring image is of a highly-successful, efficiently-run, utterly brilliant football sweatshop. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
I'm kind of torn on the NCAA regulating this. On one hand, I think this creates an unfair competitive advantage for some programs. If you have an army of analysts pouring over recruiting tapes and doing background, then the main assistant coaches are able to focus on coaching. At smaller programs, even in power 5 conferences, there is a competitive disadvantage when a single coach is doing the same job being covered by multiple "analysts" at another. Basically, some schools are able to outspend other schools before they even meet on the field.
On the other hand, it isn't against the rules. If other schools want to win then pony up the money and resources to make this happen. It's simply working within the rules. I also see some legal liability here. What happens when the OSUs, Notre Dame's, and Bama's have to fire people currently employed as analysts? Seems to me the affected individuals would have a legal case against the NCAA.