Only if they choose to be. They could add Utah or TCU and nobody would much miss Nebraska. Osborne has allowed his ego to wreck his school's athletic department. They'll be an utter disaster in the Big 10.
Texas University, and Texas A&M Board of Regents to meet in a special session on Thursday. Not sure if the meeting is combined or not. Lastly, I'll add, Gene Stallings is on our Board. He might be pushing the SEC slate come Friday.
Texas University, and Texas A&M Board of Regents to meet in a special session on Thursday. Not sure if the meeting is combined or not. Lastly, I'll add, Gene Stallings is on our Board. He might be pushing the SEC slate come Friday.
he's got a much better shot at a bcs in the big-10 IMO. look at the garbage the big-10 has gotten into the bcs recently.
Where exactly is Missouri going? C-USA? The recent reports make it pretty clear the Big 10 doesn't give a damn about them. Trading Colorado and Nebraska for TCU and Utah would end up being a win for the Big 12. With the increased revenue, Utah and TCU, who have actually been better than Colorado and Nebraska of late anyways, would be able to retain their top notch football coaches and hire better basketball coaches. You're also adding even more Dallas-Fort Worth viewers and the Salt Lake City market to offset the loss of that massive Omaha market and the 10 people in Denver who care about CU athletics.he's got a much better shot at a bcs in the big-10 IMO. look at the garbage the big-10 has gotten into the bcs recently. also a lot more tv money. colorado is gone IMO and mizzou might leave soon after. much harder to replace 3 than 1.
Then, the Baylor folks can call you Saturday and tell you what you can actually do. It'll be just like a replay of the formation of the Big 12.Tiger, its just my opinon. Im not for it, or against it.
and as for Tech "having to be involved", we'll call Tubbs on Friday and let him know what we decided.