New Article By Clay Travis

#1

byobbio

I hate instant replay.
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
1,511
Likes
73
#1
OK, there, I said it. I threw the click whore a bone. Before you read this, i warn you that you are about to fall into a trap of what something looks like on the surface must be true. So, go ahead and read this:

College Athletes Have Won the Right to Transfer Schools : Outkick The Coverage

Now, whereas on the surface, one might think it looks like universities and their head coaches are taking advantage of young kids who can't drink beer. But, a little deeper down, here's where Clay Travis is so wrong:

The transfer rules are in place for a number of reasons. Imagine if the LOI didn't exist which if it is solely in the favor of the kids then there is no reason to have it. Look at how much of a circus it is now. Kids changing their minds at the last minute after being verbally committed to a school for months. Those schools and the kids are saying that they are committed to each other. But, then, when the LOI which is a binding contract is ok to sign, the kids can simply change their mind before putting ink on paper. And so can the schools. Now, if we erase the LOI as Clay Travis is ultimately suggesting, this stuff will happen and recruiting will go on until the Kid goes to class!

Travis just does not get it: The LOI is there to protect the kid, not just the university. Once each is signed then there is a bit of certainty that few have in life.

Now, flash back to Aaron Douglas. He wanted out of UT. It doesn't matter what his real motivation was, he just wanted out and told CDD that he needed to get away from some bad people. Dooley's response, "ok if you want away, let's go at least 8 hours away and i'll release you." What's wrong with that? I'll tell you what's right: Dooley believes that if you are going to tell him something, you are telling him the truth and as a man that is responsible for you, he will do what's best based on the truth you just told him.

Flash forward to Arnett. A dad he barely knows is ill. Dooley never met the man. Now, you tell me if that is really what was going on. So, with that information and the fact that there are people out there recruiting his players, Dooley did what was right. You can transfer anywhere but Mich/Mich st. If being near your dad is so important during this time, there are colleges and universities with football programs that are closer than those two. Again, Dooley was right.

The Brice Brown situation. Seriously, the kid never met CDD in person to ask out of his LOI. I think that's enough said.

I'm sure we've all been hurt by Clay Travis' consistent barrages against CDD. And that's ok because he has a web site, I guess. But, truth is, CDD is running this program the right way. And he's trying like hell to keep the media, players' families, fans, etc., have it run the wrong way in favor of public opinion.

Me, i was embarrassed that CDD was forced to let DA out of his LOI. I have no idea how much money and time was spent recruiting that young man. Look, if he wants to go to a school because of an assistant head coach, more power to him. But, there are many lessons in life that, as a high profile athlete, he has to learn earlier in life. And that is part of the college experience. Nothing in life is guaranteed. And to base his entire college and athletic career on a single coach is disturbing.

I agree in one part about the article in that the players now know how to work the system, but I sincerely hope that CDD reverts back to what is right in the future. That if a kid wants to tear up a contract, that is fine, but our investment in the kid stays and he's ours until he either wants to pay his own way in school for a year if he wants to go somewhere where we think he improperly landed or he stays. That is the right thing.

Bottom line, Clay Travis doesn't no jack about college athletics nor does he know anything about sociology and what happens in society when certain things change.

If Clay were to read this, I would suggest a good education at a reputable university like Tennessee. If his academics are in good order maybe he could get in. If not, Pellissippi State might take him and in a couple of years with good grades, he just might be able to apply to UT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2
#2
One would have to be an idiot if one doesn't think Clay Travis is highly educated. One would also have to be an idiot if one thinks Clay Travis isn't a UT fan.
 
Last edited:
#6
#6

First, I didn't write "your an idiot", I used the proper usage; "you're".

Second, someone not an idiot wouldn't think those things, and I have faith that you're not an idiot, so you wouldn't.

But if you do believe those things, then I'm telling the truth, which surely isn't a punitive offense.

Third, I hoped you were linking me to some board rule about not defending Clay Travis, which would've been hilarious. Now I am disappoint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9
#9
As a proponent of the renewable scholarship system that's currently used, I think it would be hypocritical to not be in favor of allowing kids to transfer freely. These coaches can choose to not renew a scholarship if they want, and can also leave in the middle of the night if they want; why are we drawing the line at the student athlete?

Don't get me wrong, there should be some structure to the system, like time limits to request the transfer, but it only seems fair.
 
#11
#11
First, I didn't write "your an idiot", I used the proper usage; "you're".

Second, someone not an idiot wouldn't think those things, and I have faith that you're not an idiot, so you wouldn't.

But if you do believe those things, then I'm telling the truth, which surely isn't a punitive offense.

Third, I hoped you were linking me to some board rule about not defending Clay Travis, which would've been hilarious. Now I am disappoint.

Calling out the Freak will get you time.
 
#13
#13
Rucker's twitter

wesrucker247: James Franklin is still making friends. ACC/Maryland have filed a transfer tampering complaint against Vandy's football coach.

I'm not going to click on Clay's article, but i can venture to guess he's supporting his normal stance:

James Franklin is great and Dooley is an idiot ...

And I'm sure if the roles were reversed, his stance would flip as well. His relentlessness is laughable at this point.
 
#14
#14
First, I didn't write "your an idiot", I used the proper usage; "you're".

Second, someone not an idiot wouldn't think those things, and I have faith that you're not an idiot, so you wouldn't.

But if you do believe those things, then I'm telling the truth, which surely isn't a punitive offense.

Third, I hoped you were linking me to some board rule about not defending Clay Travis, which would've been hilarious. Now I am disappoint.

Or you could just act like a braying jackass.
 
#16
#16
I don't get how CT makes the jump from players winning a few public relations battles to the all players winning some new "right."
 
#18
#18
I don't get how CT makes the jump from players winning a few public relations battles to the all players winning some new "right."

Yeah, i think maybe you said it best (in slightly fewer words). He states his case as though the athlete is being slighted. Like their "rights" have been violated. I mean, what would a court say if they were presented the case? I'm sure it would be something like: "Did you sign the contract? Case closed".
 
#20
#20
As a proponent of the renewable scholarship system that's currently used, I think it would be hypocritical to not be in favor of allowing kids to transfer freely. These coaches can choose to not renew a scholarship if they want, and can also leave in the middle of the night if they want; why are we drawing the line at the student athlete?

Don't get me wrong, there should be some structure to the system, like time limits to request the transfer, but it only seems fair.

It's a contract between the SCHOOL and PLAYER not COACH and PLAYER! These kids need to learn what a binding commitment means. Yes a coach can up and leave but most of the time they pay a penalty, buy out. The kid must do the same, alot of money was spent getting them there. So no the players should not be allowed to transfer at will.

That being said, I do think if a coach does not renew the scholorship for whatever the reason the kid should be free to go wherever they can without penalty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#21
#21
It's a contract between the SCHOOL and PLAYER not COACH and PLAYER! These kids need to learn what a binding commitment means. Yes a coach can up and leave but most of the time they pay a penalty, buy out. The kid must do the same, alot of money was spent getting them there. So no the players should not be allowed to transfer at will.

That being said, I do think if a coach does not renew the scholorship for whatever the reason the kid should be free to go wherever they can without penalty.

Why do you emphasize that it's between the school and player? The coach decides from year to year whether to honor the commitment. Sounds like it's between the coach and player to me. If Dooley or Saban chooses to not renew a scholarship, does the university step in with another scholarship unrelated to athletics? Uh, no.

I have no problem with this system, just think it's interesting how people choose to ignore the double standard.
 
#22
#22
Why do you emphasize that it's between the school and player? The coach decides from year to year whether to honor the commitment. Sounds like it's between the coach and player to me. If Dooley or Saban chooses to not renew a scholarship, does the university step in with another scholarship unrelated to athletics? Uh, no.

I have no problem with this system, just think it's interesting how people choose to ignore the double standard.

The coach is representing the school, the contract is between the school and player. Just like your boss represents the company and in most cases can fire you at will.

Yes most of the time the school does step in with a "medical" or other made up scholorship, Saban is a master at this. That's all well and good if the player dosn't want to play anymore. My problem is when a coach feels player A isn't good enough and takes the scholly away the kid still get hit with the transfer rule.
 
#23
#23
The coach is representing the school, the contract is between the school and player. Just like your boss represents the company and in most cases can fire you at will.

Yes most of the time the school does step in with a "medical" or other made up scholorship, Saban is a master at this. That's all well and good if the player dosn't want to play anymore. My problem is when a coach feels player A isn't good enough and takes the scholly away the kid still get hit with the transfer rule.

You're arguing semantics. You talk about the real world and honoring contracts, but in the real world if I sign a one year, option renewable contract, EITHER party has the option to terminate at the end of one year. I'm not in favor of revolving doors, and I think it's ridiculous to think it would come to that.
 
#25
#25
Clay Travis does not know the game. Never played it, and does not seem to have the study habits or thought process to learn it.
 

VN Store



Back
Top