New Bin Laden message to be released

[OrangeEmpire]

Bin Laden to release new message: monitor | International | Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is expected to release a new message within the next two days, the U.S.-based terrorism monitoring service SITE Institute said on Wednesday.
The message is entitled, "The Response Will Be What You See, Not What You Hear," SITE said in a release.
It said an announcement of the pending message was posted on Wednesday, the fifth anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, by the administrator of the al Qaeda-affiliated Al-Ekhlaas Internet forum.
The message is likely to be posted by Thursday or Friday at the latest, SITE senior analyst Adam Raisman said. He based his judgment on past practice and announcement language describing the message's posting as "urgent," "shortly" and "Allah willing."
He said the announcement did not carry the usual banner but rather was made in plain text. Based on recent practice, Raisman said he expects the upcoming message to include an audio track illustrated with an image.
The message apparently is the first by bin Laden since November 29 when he urged European countries to end military participation with U.S. forces in the Afghan conflict.
(Reporting by Randall Mikkelsen; Editing by Bill Trott)

Thoughts?

 

[allvol123]

It will be his endorsement of Obama.

 

[myrobbins7]

It will be his endorsement of Obama.

:birgits_giggle:

 

[OrangeEmpire]

Maybe Bill Clinton has a connection to Osama....

 

[JTrainDavis]

And thats why he didn't want to have him turned over to us? For once, you make sense, Roscoe!!

 

[iceman9]

It will be his endorsement of Obama.

Well done sir... With Rev. Wright, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, Malik Shabazz, William Ayers, Tony Rezko, and possibly Rev. James Meeks, Bin Laden should feel right at home...

 

[allvol123]

I just figured with the week Obama is having it would be fitting.

 

[DAVOL]

I just figured with the week Obama is having it would be fitting.

He keeps putting out videos that will not help the commander in chief or his political party. Most people that even care will wonder why we've spent $500,000,000,000 of our nations money and he still is able to taunt us 7 years after 9-11.:salute:
​

 

[OrangeEmpire]

So we have spent $500,000,000,000 to kill Bin Laden?

 

[OrangeWilly]

"George Bush....I am your father........" Bin Laden

 

[OrangeEmpire]

 

[DAVOL]

So we have spent $500,000,000,000 to kill Bin Laden?

No but I'm sure people wonder why we've spent that much in the M.E. and he is still putting out videos.
​

 

[tim]

I Kill You

 

[OrangeEmpire]

No but I'm sure people wonder why we've spent that much in the M.E. and he is still putting out videos.​

I guess to kill terrorists......

 

[iceman9]

He keeps putting out videos that will not help the commander in chief or his political party. Most people that even care will wonder why we've spent $500,000,000,000 of our nations money and he still is able to taunt us 7 years after 9-11.:salute:
​

Your right, that explains why Gore lost, after Clintons failed attempts to kill him. Not killing him must have cost the Democrats to lose the Presidency.....

 

[tim]

Your right, that explains why Gore lost, after Clintons failed attempts to kill him. Not killing him must have cost the Democrats to lose the Presidency.....

Facts, facts, facts... Stop with the facts already.

 

[DAVOL]

Your right, that explains why Gore lost, after Clintons failed attempts to kill him. Not killing him must have cost the Democrats to lose the Presidency.....

Well Gore did get more of the popular vote but it sure could've had something to do with the whipping the republicans took in the 2006 election alot of which happened in what some call red states.:dance2:
​

 

[tim]

Well Gore did get more of the popular vote but it sure could've had something to do with the whipping the republicans took in the 2006 election alot of which happened in what some call red states.:dance2:
​

And we all know what a success those 06 elections are/were. How are all of those good Dems doing up there in Pelosi land?

 

[iceman9]

Well Gore did get more of the popular vote but it sure could've had something to do with the whipping the republicans took in the 2006 election alot of which happened in what some call red states.:dance2:
​

Yes and their constant 15% approval rating has shown us all their leadership ability. And 2006 had more to do with the Republicans spending like drunken sailors on leave, and acting like elitist, we have exactly the same actions going on in 2008, just different sides of the political spectrum.

 

[DAVOL]

Yes and their constant 15% approval rating has shown us all their leadership ability. And 2006 had more to do with the Republicans spending like drunken sailors on leave, and acting like elitist, we have exactly the same actions going on in 2008, just different sides of the political spectrum.

Out of curiosity where did you get that 15% number it appears made up.Here I'll help you out since you need it.
Congress: Job Ratings
Congress: Democrats
Congress: Republicans
Notice that the Dems in congress still averages higher than the GOP even if they all are low.Some of you make this too easy.Oh just for fun lets compare Clintons last year to Bush's.
Bush: Job Ratings
Clinton: Job Ratings

​

 

[iceman9]

Out of curiosity where did you get that 15% number it appears made up.Here I'll help you out since you need it.
Congress: Job Ratings
Congress: Democrats
Congress: Republicans
Notice that the Dems in congress still averages higher than the GOP even if they all are low.Some of you make this too easy.Oh just for fun lets compare Clintons last year to Bush's.
Bush: Job Ratings
Clinton: Job Ratings

​

From the Gallup pole: 18% was the lowest ever recorded between 91 and 94, this congress sunk to 14%, and by the way, when I need opinion like yours I will renew my subscription to the NWT.

 

[allvol123]

He keeps putting out videos that will not help the commander in chief or his political party. Most people that even care will wonder why we've spent $500,000,000,000 of our nations money and he still is able to taunt us 7 years after 9-11.:salute:​

He taunts us? Seems to me he lives a live of hiding.

 

[overseasorange2]

A message For Bin......:the_finger::Bbiteme::neener2:

 

[OrangeEmpire]

Just think if there were no democrats....

We wouldn't have crime, poverty, debt, racism, hate...

It would be a perfect utopia!

 

[DAVOL]

From the Gallup pole: 18% was the lowest ever recorded between 91 and 94, this congress sunk to 14%, and by the way, when I need opinion like yours I will renew my subscription to the NWT.

Funny 18% is the lowest I see for this congress from any poll. By the way when was your last eye exam?Oh and if you don't like my opinions don't read my posts was'nt that basically the advice you gave me about an hour ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVOL

Honestly it's for one reason and one reason only the fact that they use the term fair and balanced in their advertising to me that is blatant false advertising even if one could say it is based solely on opinion.
​

What a crock, you don't like them don't watch. Your local newsperson is biased, every human being is biased about some topic or another. News is not fact driven, its opinion driven, you could come on and say ok here it is, show clips for 20 minutes, and say good nite. All media is slanted one way or another on any variety of subject matter. If you like Olbermann, then watch him, you have that choice, if I want to watch Glen Beck, that s my choice. I believe Fox is fair and balanced, thats my friggin opinion, you don't think so, thats your friggin opinion. This forum is based on opinion, such is all of life
​