No I am not ok but I see a roster that is finally on the verge of being SEC ready. We did finally have a few arms they can win in the SEC and even though I have some doubts about the offense there are four freshmen hitters doing really well. I just think if blowing it up is to be done it should have been done last year. A year later it appears to be a core group of real sec players is in place
SEC-ready? I don't see it.
My concept of SEC-ready involves intense competition for every spot in the lineup, every spot in the rotation, and every meaningful relief role.
It means having more people on the bench ready and able to contribute than there are game situations to put them into.
It means having a stable of young arms getting conference experience in set up roles and match-up and help situations--being groomed for bigger things next year.
We're not even close.
SEC-ready teams are all hand on deck for the weekend. We extend our weekend starters out of necessity to avoid exposing our bullpen, and we try to use as few relievers as possible each weekend except in games that are already out of hand.
How many pitchers do we have who don't put a knot in your stomach when they come in? How many of those will be back and ready to assume larger roles next year? If the answer to your second question is less than six, you don't have an SEC-ready pitching staff.
Offense, as you note, is even weaker. Depending on what happens with the suspended players, we might return only 6 or 8 HR, and only 5 or 6 hitters with 50 AB, all but one of them underclassmen.
We're going to be young again on offense. SEC-ready teams are young because their freshmen are such studs that they win spots. We're young because we have holes to fill and no one groomed to fill them.
I don't see a reason to believe next year will be any better. We're six years into the Serrano era, and this is what we get: just enough good players to give hope, not enough to compete in the SEC. I'm not sure what it is you think we'd be blowing up if we change coaches.