NFL 1st Rounders and their CFB recruiting ranking

#1

UGADawg4Life

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
3,470
Likes
798
#1
SEC = 11 off the list, a full third :yes:

FIRST ROUND
1. Kansas City -- Eric Fisher, OT, Central Michigan -- No rating
2. Jacksonville -- Luke Joeckel, OT, Texas A&M -- 81 grade, four stars (No. 83 on ESPN 150, No. 6 OT)
3. Miami -- Dion Jordan, OLB, Oregon -- 78 grade (No. 24 TE)
4. Philadelphia -- Lane Johnson, OT, Oklahoma -- No rating (juco transfer)
5. Detroit -- Ezekial Ansah, DE, BYU -- No rating
6. Cleveland -- Barkevious Mingo, DE, LSU -- 78 grade (No. 34 OLB)
7. Arizona -- Jonathan Cooper, OG, North Carolina -- 78 grade (No. 17 OG)
8. St. Louis -- Tavon Austin, WR, West Virginia -- 78 grade (No. 41 running back)
9. N.Y. Jets -- Dee Milliner, CB, Alabama -- 84 grade, four stars (No. 16 overall, No. 2 CB)
10. Tennessee -- Chance Warmack, OG, Alabama -- 79 grade (No. 16 OG)
11. San Diego -- D.J. Fluker, OT, Alabama -- 86 grade (No. 12 overall, No. 1 OT)
12. Oakland -- DJ Hayden, CB, Houston -- No rating (juco transfer)
13. N.Y. Jets -- Sheldon Richardson, DT, Missouri -- No rating (juco transfer); initially 81 grade (No. 107 overall, No. 8 DT)
14. Carolina -- Star Lotulelei, DT, Utah -- No rating (juco transfer); initially 67 grade, No. 113 DT
15. New Orleans -- Kenny Vaccaro, S, Texas -- 78 grade (No. 42 safety)
16. Buffalo -- EJ Manuel, QB, Florida State -- 82 grade (No. 51 overall, No. 6 QB)
17. Pittsburgh -- Jarvis Jones, OLB, Georgia -- 82 grade (No. 59 overall, No. 6 OLB)
18. San Francisco -- Eric Reid, S, LSU -- 81 grade (No. 71 overall, No. 7 S)
19. N.Y. Giants -- Justin Pugh, OT, N.Y. Giants -- No rating
20. Chicago -- Kyle Long, OG, Oregon -- 81 grade (No. 123 overall, No. 12 OT)
21. Cincinnati -- Tyler Eifert, TE, Notre Dame -- 79 grade (No. 13 TE)
22. Atlanta -- Desmond Trufant, CB, Washington -- 74 grade (No. 69 CB)
23. Minnesota -- Sharrif Floyd, DT, Florida -- 83 grade (No. 25 overall, No. 3 DT)
24. Indianapolis -- Bjoern Werner, DE, Florida State -- 79 grade (No. 24 DE)
25. Minnesota -- Xavier Rhodes, CB, Florida State -- 77 grade (No. 61 WR)
26. Green Bay -- Datone Jones, DE, UCLA -- 79 grade (No. 15 DE)
27. Houston -- DeAndre Hopkins, WR, Clemson -- 79 grade (No. 32 athlete)
28. Denver -- Sylvester Williams, DT, North Carolina -- No rating (juco transfer)
29. Minnesota -- Cordarrelle Patterson, WR, Tennessee -- No rating (juco transfer)
30. St. Louis -- Alec Ogletree, ILB, Georgia -- 83 grade (No. 29 overall, No. 4 S)
31. Dallas -- Travis Frederick, OC, Wisconsin -- 76 grade (No. 63 OT)
32. Baltimore -- Matt Elam, S, Florida -- 86 grade (No. 9 overall, No. 2 athlete)
 
Last edited:
#3
#3
I'm wondering what happened to the five star guys that declared this year.... David Ricky didn't even get drafted.
 
#5
#5
Let's not forget that the number one pick in the draft, Eric Fisher, was recruited by one Coach Butch Jones at Central Michigan
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10
#10
I believe it. I saw a statistic before of star rankings that make it to the NFL.And if I remember it was
1. 3☆
2. 4☆
3. UR
4. 5☆
5. 2☆

And there was not much difference between the UR, 5☆ and 2☆ in the numbers!
 
#11
#11
People always bring up this kind of logic, and it's always borderline retarded.

"More 3*s are in the NFL than 5*s!!! OMG!"

Yes, because there are ~750 3 stars every year and about 25 5 stars. As a percentage, which is what matters, 5-stars are about 15 times more likely (IIRC) to go in the first 50 picks of the NFL draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#12
#12
Star-Power-Draft-Chart.jpg


The bottom of that graph really doesn't do justice to the huge gulf between the ratio of four-star prospects who go in the first round (roughly 1 in 22, on average) and the ratio of two-star/walk-on players who go in the first round (roughly 1 in 300) but you get the idea: The four and five-star players, a group that makes up a little under 13 percent of the entire population of college players, accounts for just shy of 60 percent of first-rounders.

Star Power: How recruiting rankings hold up at the top of the NFL Draft - Dr. Saturday - NCAAF Blog - Yahoo! Sports
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#13
#13
It's a percentage thing for those who still refuse to get it.

A 5 star is more likely to produce. Period. End of story.

Not a guarantee. Just like a 2 star is not guaranteed to fail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#14
#14
People always bring up this kind of logic, and it's always borderline retarded.

"More 3*s are in the NFL than 5*s!!! OMG!"

Yes, because there are ~750 3 stars every year and about 25 5 stars. As a percentage, which is what matters, 5-stars are about 15 times more likely (IIRC) to go in the first 50 picks of the NFL draft.

God bless you
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#15
#15
There are plenty of 5 star players on that list.. Not sure where those ratings came from.
 
#18
#18
People always bring up this kind of logic, and it's always borderline retarded.

"More 3*s are in the NFL than 5*s!!! OMG!"

Yes, because there are ~750 3 stars every year and about 25 5 stars. As a percentage, which is what matters, 5-stars are about 15 times more likely (IIRC) to go in the first 50 picks of the NFL draft.

Your simple math and obvious logic are not welcome, sir.
 
#20
#20
People always bring up this kind of logic, and it's always borderline retarded.

"More 3*s are in the NFL than 5*s!!! OMG!"

Yes, because there are ~750 3 stars every year and about 25 5 stars. As a percentage, which is what matters, 5-stars are about 15 times more likely (IIRC) to go in the first 50 picks of the NFL draft.

True. Bama has won 3 NTs in the last four years after having 2 or 3 No. 1 recruiting classes. It ain't rocket sciene.
 
#23
#23
:post-4-1090547912:This tell me the only difference between a 5 star and a 3 star is 2 get it 5-3=2:post-4-1090547912:
 
#25
#25
People always bring up this kind of logic, and it's always borderline retarded.

"More 3*s are in the NFL than 5*s!!! OMG!"

Yes, because there are ~750 3 stars every year and about 25 5 stars. As a percentage, which is what matters, 5-stars are about 15 times more likely (IIRC) to go in the first 50 picks of the NFL draft.

Solid logic, but you left out the quality factor. If Bill Gates were in a college class of 2,000, his chances of being "most-likely-to-succeed" wouldn't be 1/2,000, it's be much higher, given his obvious talents. So 5-stars should, therefore, be more likely to attain top ranking, if the ranking system were accurate.
 

VN Store



Back
Top