armchair
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 10,948
- Likes
- 7,608
look athletic, as a team, and they are running again. The program's best team ever was a running team--and then Summitt & Co. could never come close to putting a similar squad on the floor. The guard recruiting was really bad for several years--PS became strangely enamored of big, slow players and heady guards (many from Indiana) who were not athletic--and that is Warlick's first job if she wants to win a national title. Recruit good, athletic guards--one of which, Scaife, we lost today, unfortunately. We need a team that can play great pressure defense and then run the court.
Talent evaluation is key with recruiting. If you analyze the top 21 HS prospects every year, odds are that a number of them do not have the game to excel at the top of the Div. 1 level, even though they were highly rated coming out of HS. About 7 will be good/very good, another 7 will be decent/good, and 7 will not fulfill their potential and will have average to disappointing careers when assessed against their high ranking. That's why evaluation is key. The three girls we landed this year look quite good, so off we go with a new era of UT women's basketball. It's time we got back to the Final Four, for starters.
Talent evaluation is key with recruiting. If you analyze the top 21 HS prospects every year, odds are that a number of them do not have the game to excel at the top of the Div. 1 level, even though they were highly rated coming out of HS. About 7 will be good/very good, another 7 will be decent/good, and 7 will not fulfill their potential and will have average to disappointing careers when assessed against their high ranking. That's why evaluation is key. The three girls we landed this year look quite good, so off we go with a new era of UT women's basketball. It's time we got back to the Final Four, for starters.