You are all missing the bigger point here. Yes, it's wonderful that this prospect is sticking with her commitment--but she had committed to UT and PS, and that obviously made a difference. Moving forward, Summitt's condition and her future is going to be an issue--a negative issue. UT will lose recruits it might otherwise have gotten because of uncertainty about who, really, is running the program, Summitt or her assistants--and because she almost certainly be around in four years. That means that players who are high-school juniors and seniors now will not be coached by her for their full collegiate career. That will work against UT, obviously, as few prospects will want to commit to a coach who is not going to see them through the next four+ years. Going year to year with PS may be good for her, but it is not going to help the program. Let's be clear about that. Are you, a top prospect, going to pick UT, with all the uncertainty about PS's condition, or dare I say it, connecticut, where you know that geno will be coaching indefinitely. That will be a problem.
