RiseToTheTop
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2013
- Messages
- 25,194
- Likes
- 40,643
You're right, not a single person picking Mizzou actually does this for a living. You're the only one that sees the truth!
Give me a break DUDE I'm hoping you're just a HOMER, and not truly as NAIVE as you sound.
The Vols absolutely have the ability to win, and I hope they do. But this idea that had we not played Bama and Oregon on the road that people would be saying "TENNESSEE IS BACK" is IDIOTIC.
I haven't found any major sportswriter picking UT to win this game over Mizzou. I can't even find anyone that has us keeping it close (i.e. within a touchdown). It almost seems as if we were being given a better shot to beat Alabama by the media.
CBS Sports picks
ESPN Blogger Picks
Stewart Mandel at Sports Illustrated
I'm normally the last guy to be a "homer." But I can't for the life of me understand why no one thinks we have a shot.
We beat South Carolina. Mizzou lost to South Carolina, without Connor Shaw for the first half. South Carolina played one of the most horrendous half of football it's had in several years, and still beat Mizzou.
We nearly beat Georgia. Mizzou beat UGA handily, but UGA also turned the ball over 4 times against Mizzou. Without winning the TO battle decisively, UGA probably wins that game. And of course, UGA was banged up after the UT game, as well.
Mizzou's most impressive win, by far, was versus Florida. Honestly, though, I don't think Florida is very good without a healthy Jeff Driskel. The backup QB may have beat us, but that had a lot to do with our defense being too slow to get to the corner (our big weakness this year).
I'm not dogging Mizzou. They've had a great season, but I'm just not seeing how beating up on two injury-plagued teams makes Mizzou the "second best team in the SEC." I've watched Missouri a few times this year, and frankly, I'd put them below Bama, LSU, A&M, Auburn, and South Carolina at the very least.
Mizzou deserves to be the favorites, I'll give them that. But these teams are way more evenly matched than the media seems to believe. Maybe the media ends up being right and we have our butts handed to us, but unless we decisively lose the turnover battle, it seems more likely to be a close game to me.
I think our guys come out with a chip on their shoulder and win this one! I can't remember us being such huge underdogs for no good reason since the 2001 Florida game.
GO VOLS!
How many times has Mizzou played Oregon and Bama this season?
Honestly, this is one reason why many "upsets" happen. Because the vast majority of people are too stupid to analyze anything beyond W-L records.
A team that plays 9 top 25 teams and goes 4-5 against them is often better than a team that plays 3 top 25 teams and goes 0-3. Yet, it's rare for a 7-5 team to be ranked above a 9-3 team, even when the latter has 4 quality wins and the former has 0. In college football, we punish teams for losing, rather than rewarding them for winning. It's a flawed way of analyzing the game.
Not saying UT will win (though I am picking us). I think both teams are very evenly matched. But the idea that Mizzou is a "top 10" team is based solely off of a much simpler schedule. If the Vols played Mizzou's schedule, we'd be 6-2 and probably in the top 15. All the pundits would be screaming about how "TENNESSEE IS BACK!" But because we played Alabama and Oregon, we're "mediocre."
I think we win, but it's not like picking Mizzou is silly or anything.
Off topic, but anyone notice how the ESPN Gameday 'regulars' shut out Finebaum during the roundtable discussion this AM? He kept trying to interject why Bama deserves #1 just by the 'eye' test and all of them shut him out. He finally said 'crowded here today' when he could not get a comment in. Thought that was funny, he must have little respect from the on air crew.
UT has won 3 SEC road games in the last 6 seasons! 2 against Vandy and 1 against UK.
Until UT proves otherwise, the smart pick is the home team. UT can take a huge step forward tonight.
I haven't found any major sportswriter picking UT to win this game over Mizzou. I can't even find anyone that has us keeping it close (i.e. within a touchdown). It almost seems as if we were being given a better shot to beat Alabama by the media.
CBS Sports picks
ESPN Blogger Picks
Stewart Mandel at Sports Illustrated
I'm normally the last guy to be a "homer." But I can't for the life of me understand why no one thinks we have a shot.
We beat South Carolina. Mizzou lost to South Carolina, without Connor Shaw for the first half. South Carolina played one of the most horrendous half of football it's had in several years, and still beat Mizzou.
We nearly beat Georgia. Mizzou beat UGA handily, but UGA also turned the ball over 4 times against Mizzou. Without winning the TO battle decisively, UGA probably wins that game. And of course, UGA was banged up after the UT game, as well.
Mizzou's most impressive win, by far, was versus Florida. Honestly, though, I don't think Florida is very good without a healthy Jeff Driskel. The backup QB may have beat us, but that had a lot to do with our defense being too slow to get to the corner (our big weakness this year).
I'm not dogging Mizzou. They've had a great season, but I'm just not seeing how beating up on two injury-plagued teams makes Mizzou the "second best team in the SEC." I've watched Missouri a few times this year, and frankly, I'd put them below Bama, LSU, A&M, Auburn, and South Carolina at the very least.
Mizzou deserves to be the favorites, I'll give them that. But these teams are way more evenly matched than the media seems to believe. Maybe the media ends up being right and we have our butts handed to us, but unless we decisively lose the turnover battle, it seems more likely to be a close game to me.
I think our guys come out with a chip on their shoulder and win this one! I can't remember us being such huge underdogs for no good reason since the 2001 Florida game.
GO VOLS!
How many times has Mizzou played Oregon and Bama this season?
Honestly, this is one reason why many "upsets" happen. Because the vast majority of people are too stupid to analyze anything beyond W-L records.
A team that plays 9 top 25 teams and goes 4-5 against them is often better than a team that plays 3 top 25 teams and goes 0-3. Yet, it's rare for a 7-5 team to be ranked above a 9-3 team, even when the latter has 4 quality wins and the former has 0. In college football, we punish teams for losing, rather than rewarding them for winning. It's a flawed way of analyzing the game.
Not saying UT will win (though I am picking us). I think both teams are very evenly matched. But the idea that Mizzou is a "top 10" team is based solely off of a much simpler schedule. If the Vols played Mizzou's schedule, we'd be 6-2 and probably in the top 15. All the pundits would be screaming about how "TENNESSEE IS BACK!" But because we played Alabama and Oregon, we're "mediocre."