I remember a lot of people thought it was strange to build a statue to a player because that is a way to run out of room quickly. I don't think anyone cared that they did it and don't think it has been mentioned since until of course one of them brought it up again for us to talk about again. I think the false banner got the most attention.
It is BS means nothing to nobody and counts for nothing. That is what is false about it.What is false about the banner? It does not claim a National Championship. SC ended the season as the consensus #1 team in the country when the college season ended abruptly. I believe the banner should have said "consensus" instead of "unanimous" due to the fact a minority of the voters voted Oregon number one. So they should be the only team/fan base with an issue with it. The banner was put up for her players and the fans as a reward for the season they had.
What is false about the banner? It does not claim a National Championship. SC ended the season as the consensus #1 team in the country when the college season ended abruptly. I believe the banner should have said "consensus" instead of "unanimous" due to the fact a minority of the voters voted Oregon number one. So they should be the only team/fan base with an issue with it. The banner was put up for her players and the fans as a reward for the season they had.
The classless part of the SC banner is that it is subjective. Certainly, Oregon was a team that was very strong as well as some other teams. The number one in the AP poll at the end of the season does not always win NC and it changes a lot during the year. The rankings are subjective and also differ based on who is doing the ranking.
They have a banner as SEC champions for the year they had. Only 63% of teams with the #1 seed have won the NCAA D1 National Championship Tournament. They are trying to say they were the best team in the country when many, if not most, prognosticators thought Oregon was playing better at the end of the season.
The classless part of the SC banner is that it is subjective. Certainly, Oregon was a team that was very strong as well as some other teams. The number one in the AP poll at the end of the season does not always win NC and it changes a lot during the year. The rankings are subjective and also differ based on who is doing the ranking.
What is false about the banner? It does not claim a National Championship. SC ended the season as the consensus #1 team in the country when the college season ended abruptly. I believe the banner should have said "consensus" instead of "unanimous" due to the fact a minority of the voters voted Oregon number one. So they should be the only team/fan base with an issue with it. The banner was put up for her players and the fans as a reward for the season they had.
It’s the very definition of a participation trophy and very unbecoming of a program with a NC.
And everyone outside of the UCF fan base laughed at them for it.
Again a national title was not being claimed.
And everyone outside of the UCF fan base laughed at them for it.
Not everyone Colley-Matrix, one of the official rankings used by the NCAA to determine its champions, named UCF as national champions. That is why they claimed the title. No one said Dawn was national champions even after she appealed to the NCAA to name SCAR as national champions.
Yes to both of these statements. I have no problems with Dawn and believe she's a good coach who has built an outstanding program but the banner is the definition of WTH? She lobbied after season's end to be named national champions after it was clear the NCAA had no plans to do so. They had a fantastic year and if they wished to include their undefeated record on the SEC champs banner then go right ahead.
I agreed with the UCF criticism then and still do. They had a wonderful year and deserved to be recognized for it but to claim they had a share of the NC was ridiculous. I have a feeling it was mostly done as a PR stunt to increase interest in the program for local fans.
Not to mention they had essentially the same team this season…and no NC.
We have a statue of Pat. We do not have a statue of Chamiqua, Tamika or Candace.
I think the difference is obvious.
So tell me that you think Pat and Aja are similarly worthy?True, we don’t have statues of any of our great players, but I actually think the statue of Wilson makes perfect sense and I’m really glad the university did it.
What many people are forgetting is that one of the major differences between Chamique/Tamika/Candace and Aja Wilson is that Wilson is actually proudly FROM South Carolina.
Unlike our “bests,” Wilson made the almost mind-blowing (at the time) decision to turn down ALL of the top programs who greatly coveted her in order to stay home and try to get South Carolina out of the perpetual cellar of the SEC.
And she did it — even winning a national championship!!! She’s a hometown hero who took a huge personal risk in betting she’d never regret choosing South Carolina.
So, yeah. South Carolina’s own Aja Wilson (Dawn Staley) put South Carolina Women’s Basketball on the map — MORE than just “on the map” — and that’s something the entire state was proud enough of to give her a statue. I LOVE it!!!
So tell me that you think Pat and Aja are similarly worthy?