He tends to miss a lot of things. Jokes being only one of many categories. He acted like I was insane for saying "I think Mizzou has more talent than we do (though not by much)". He also acted like I was insane for saying Mizzou has two capable QB's. I didn't say Mauk was a world-beater, didn't say he was a Heisman candidate, I said he was capable. He took issue with that. My advice to you would be to put him on your ignore list.
Oh yeah, he also listed how many stars the starters for each team had, on both sides of the ball. His very next sentence was "I am NOT a star gazer."
Edit: Here's my entire post that he took issue with. I'd say it was pretty accurate, but of course I'm biased.
In my first sentence, I was disagreeing with his opinion that UT has more talent than Mizzou.
"Personally, I disagree. I think Mizzou has a ton of talent, more so than UT at this point (though not by much). Their top 4 receivers are all 6'4" or taller, and very athletic (I believe one was the #1 WR in his class), and we all know they have two QB's who are very capable, to say the least. Regarding the experience comment, that's true, but you have to remember that even though we're 8 games into the season, our QB only has 2 quarters of experience. I have confidence in Dobbs, but don't be surprised if he makes some rookie mistakes. He's going to be facing a pretty nasty pass rush from Mizzou. The O-line and receivers need to step up and make sure they're on their A-game with blitz pick ups and hot routes."
And I was wrong about the top-4 receivers' height. It was the top-3.