Ny house flips from blue to red

[Volgolfer1618]

New York Judge flips house seat from DEM to GOP after Judge Allowed Signature Check

After judge allows signatures to be checked. Amazing how voting accountable works.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Uhh oh...

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

LOL

 

[ajvol01]

Uhh oh...

Apparently the fraud doesn’t have to be widespread to actually impact the outcome

 

[volfanhill]

Your source is garbage and is not wording things correctly on purpose. The Dem did not have any votes taken away from the official talley. He was asking the court to certify some votes and the judge said no.

Tenney nears victory after judge rules against key Brindisi ballots in NY 22nd race

 

[LouderVol]

284 of the +1000 seems like a pretty good hit rate imo for overturned votes.

 

[AirVol]

Dims wrote the book on cheating.

 

[utvolpj]

Below are some of the biggest categories of votes that Brindisi wanted to count but that the judge ruled would not:

128 ballots from voters who voted in the right election district but wrong polling place, in addition to 20 ballots cast in the wrong county.
85 ballots from voters who were listed in the state voter database as “purged.”
51 ballots from voters who dropped their absentee ballots in a ballot drop box outside of their election district, ballots that were later sent to the correct polling place after a state deadline.

this is clearly elaborate, systemic fraud

The judge also overruled Tenney’s objections on 62 ballots alleging that the signatures on the ballot did not match signatures in a state voter database. Brindisi’s campaign argued that those 62 ballots should count.

If anything the mismatched signatures seem to have been allowed

 

[AM64]

How can this happen if election workers are actually checking voter ID and verifying voter is registered? The "purged" voters might have been given the opportunity to for provisional ballots to resolve registration errors, but the other part makes no sense at all.

• 128 ballots from voters who voted in the right election district but wrong polling place, in addition to 20 ballots cast in the wrong county.

 

[Vol737]

Dims wrote the book on cheating.

I thought it was Alabama? Oops, sorry. Wrong thread. Carry on.

 

[USAFgolferVol]

Dims wrote the book on cheating.

Yes. Republicans don't cheat in elections!

 

[C-south]

Yes. Republicans don't cheat in elections!

I doubt you will find many Republicans against voter IDs, audits, or any other checks that would make elections more secure.

 

[Redleg68]

Apparently the fraud doesn’t have to be widespread to actually impact the outcome

Around a change or elimination of 44.000 votes out of 150,000,000 would change the Presidential winner.

 

[USAFgolferVol]

I doubt you will find many Republicans against voter IDs, audits, or any other checks that would make elections more secure.

OK! LMFAO!

 

[Carl Pickens]

Yes. Republicans don't cheat in elections!

They’re all for presenting a photo ID.... but you know..... that’s racist to democrats

 

[C-south]

OK! LMFAO!

So the party that proposes these are really against them?

 

[VolnJC]

House GOP undefeated in reelection races last term and one every single tossup race according to Cook's Poltical report. They only need to flip 5 in the midterms....should be easy with blue states losing districts and census redistricting

 

[USAFgolferVol]

They’re all for presenting a photo ID.... but you know..... that’s racist to democrats

I don't have a problem with photo Id's. That you think that's the only avenue for voter fraud is cute and makes you look cool to the other dolts in the forum. By actual evidence in this last election, cite the cases of actual, proven voter fraud by party. With that being said, I am in favor of an audit of every vote in the 2020 election inclusive of all offices

 

[Carl Pickens]

I don't have a problem with photo Id's. That you think that's the only avenue for voter fraud is cute and makes you look cool to the other dolts in the forum. By actual evidence in this last election, cite the cases of actual, proven voter fraud by party. With that being said, I am in favor of an audit of every vote in the 2020 election inclusive of all offices

Well aren’t you special?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

I don't have a problem with photo Id's. That you think that's the only avenue for voter fraud is cute and makes you look cool to the other dolts in the forum. By actual evidence in this last election, cite the cases of actual, proven voter fraud by party. With that being said, I am in favor of an audit of every vote in the 2020 election inclusive of all offices

And only American citizens???

 

[C-south]

I don't have a problem with photo Id's. That you think that's the only avenue for voter fraud is cute and makes you look cool to the other dolts in the forum. By actual evidence in this last election, cite the cases of actual, proven voter fraud by party. With that being said, I am in favor of an audit of every vote in the 2020 election inclusive of all offices

Why do you think dims were such a huge proponent of mail in ballots?

 

[Vol737]

OK! LMFAO!

And Dems are in favor of these measures that would strengthen the integrity of our elections? Since when? Let’s put a comprehensive bill on the table that addresses voter IDs, requires stringent and exact audits of counting mail in ballots/signature verification and the same stringent criteria for verifiable online voting, etc. and watch the excuses pour in as to why not from the left. You know good and well Dems don’t want that. Fast and loose is the name of the game.

 

[AM64]

I doubt you will find many Republicans against voter IDs, audits, or any other checks that would make elections more secure.

That's probably going to be a hard sell to the lefties here. Over in the "coup" thread their story is those on the right want to destroy the Constitution. This is "Lefties in Wonderland" or "Progressively Lost in Space" or "Invasion of the Mind Snatchers " or something - they're losing it faster than Joe.