Obama blogger suing Bible publishers

#1

KB5252

Repeat Forward Progress Victim
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
38,173
Likes
37,225
#1
Has anyone else heard about this? A man who blogs on Obama's website has sued Bible publishers because it is offensive to him as a gay man more or less. You can look it up for yourself (If I knew how to link I would) What do you guys think?
 
#2
#2
That is crazy...its kind of like the man that is suing the church because supposedly he will so full of the holy spirit that he fell and hit his head!
 
#3
#3
That is crazy...its kind of like the man that is suing the church because supposedly he will so full of the holy spirit that he fell and hit his head!
hadn't heard that one. That is terrible! So he is suing God?
 
#10
#10
So you are suggesting that Obama might actually be pro-Bible? :crazy:

Just thought I would throw that in there before some of our more intelligent posters decided to start posting doctored photos of Barack Obama having a scotch with Satan, Ahmadinejad and the bad guy from Temple of Doom
 
#11
#11
Just thought I would throw that in there before some of our more intelligent posters decided to start posting doctored photos of Barack Obama having a scotch with Satan, Ahmadinejad and the bad guy from Temple of Doom


I have that picture and it is real.
 
#15
#15
Christianity is being pushed more and more out of this country and I see no end in sight. It's crap like this that just makes you ask yourself, what is going on with our country.
 
#16
#16
Just to clarify, anyone can blog on Obama's website

I am pretty sure my blog would not stay up on their site very long.:) But seriously emain, with Obama's statements on religion, sexuality and the Bible in particular I don't think it would be a stretch to say these two share beliefs. Not to say that Obama thinks these publishers should be forced to edit the Bible (At least I hope not).
 
#17
#17
That's exactly why I'm voting for McCain. Can you believe the nerve of Obama to allow these people to blog for him? :ermm:

I'm going to start a thread about not voting for McCain. He must be a womanizer because his wife, although old, is much better looking than him so he must be the type to go out and pick up women. Must be.
 
#18
#18
That's exactly why I'm voting for McCain. Can you believe the nerve of Obama to allow these people to blog for him? :ermm:

I'm going to start a thread about not voting for McCain. He must be a womanizer because his wife, although old, is much better looking than him so he must be the type to go out and pick up women. Must be.

Is anything above supposed to make any sense?
 
#19
#19
Is anything above supposed to make any sense?

Funny, I was asking myself the same thing when I read your opportunity to link Obama to someone blogging for him. It's an obvious non story trying to sway opinion that Obama hates the bible. So I decided to make up an equally ridiculous illustration on McCain. It looks more ridiculous when it's the guy you support, huh? Should all of our views and opinions be linked to either Freak or the University Of Tennessee if we post on Vol Nation? What's the difference?
 
#20
#20
Funny, I was asking myself the same thing when I read your opportunity to link Obama to someone blogging for him. It's an obvious non story trying to sway opinion that Obama hates the bible. So I decided to make up an equally ridiculous illustration on McCain. It looks more ridiculous when it's the guy you support, huh? Should all of our views and opinions be linked to either Freak or the University Of Tennessee if we post on Vol Nation? What's the difference?

The difference in the way we went about about it was that I used Obama's past statements about his beliefs on what was written in the Bible and their meaning to come to my conclusion. You on the other hand just typed drivel and tried to compare the two. You should read the last line of my post again if, it clearly states that I do not believe Obama is for censorship of the Bible.
 
#21
#21
The difference in the way we went about about it was that I used Obama's past statements about his beliefs on what was written in the Bible and their meaning to come to my conclusion. You on the other hand just typed drivel and tried to compare the two. You should read the last line of my post again if, it clearly states that I do not believe Obama is for censorship of the Bible.

Than what is this thread really all about, some blogger that none of us know anything about? Someone that is not in the public eye. Who is this guy and if you don't believe Obama is for censorship of the Bible than why is this relevant? What are Obama's beliefs on what was written in the Bible? Yes, I typed "drivel" but that's what I thought about this thread.
 
#22
#22
Than what is this thread really all about, some blogger that none of us know anything about? Someone that is not in the public eye. Who is this guy and if you don't believe Obama is for censorship of the Bible than why is this relevant? What are Obama's beliefs on what was written in the Bible? Yes, I typed "drivel" but that's what I thought about this thread.

Obama is of the ilk that think certain passages in the Bible should be an inspiration to gay people, while others that specifically address it should be considered "obscure" or not as important. Just pointing out that Obama holds these views so they are not conflicting with this obscure publicity stunt. Just found it interesting that this guy would be an Obama blogger, or the type of person who would be inspired by his campaign in light of his previous statements on scriptures.
 
#23
#23
Than what is this thread really all about, some blogger that none of us know anything about? Someone that is not in the public eye. Who is this guy and if you don't believe Obama is for censorship of the Bible than why is this relevant? What are Obama's beliefs on what was written in the Bible? Yes, I typed "drivel" but that's what I thought about this thread.

If Obama had not had so many of this type of incidents this would be a non issue (probably is anyway). For such a newcomer to have so many incidents surrounding his campaign it can't be a good sign IMO. Is this the type of stuff we can look forward to for the next four years? Especially after all we have endured during Bush's tenure?
 

VN Store



Back
Top