GoBigOrangeVols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 8,532
- Likes
- 5,373
I believe there should be only 2 divisions of all sports. Juco for academic casualties and big boy. Divisions 1-A, 1-AA, 2, 3 & Juco is ridiculous. How ridiculous for same collegiate sport there are multiple champions.
And two divisions of naia. But due to school sizes and budgets there's no way it would be fun to lump everyone together. I like having different divisions.
I say make the one division of like 500 schools and for the chumps who win the CAA or Atlantic10 a bowl game in a town like Mobile AL. They shouldnt get to claim a national title imo. This usnt peewee teeball. It is time to teach young people only one person can be #1.
You don't pay attention to basketball much, do you?I say make the one division of like 500 schools and for the chumps who win the CAA or Atlantic10 a bowl game in a town like Mobile AL. They shouldnt get to claim a national title imo. This usnt peewee teeball. It is time to teach young people only one person can be #1.
I say make the one division of like 500 schools and for the chumps who win the CAA or Atlantic10 a bowl game in a town like Mobile AL. They shouldnt get to claim a national title imo. This usnt peewee teeball. It is time to teach young people only one person can be #1.
when I mentioned this in the VCU to A10 thread a couple of hours ago, I mentioned that the CAA is in trouble. George Mason and (supposedly) James Madison are looking for other conferences and now Georgia State, VCU and my beloved ODU Monarchs are on their way out. I will miss all the traditional in state rivalries, but this is a chance ODU just couldn't pass up. Hopefully the CAA will see the $$$ they could lose if they stick to their bylaws and don't allow ODU to compete for CAA titles next year.
I think his point is more that those smaller conferences by and large get/would get dominated by the current FBS teams.
I think his point is more that those smaller conferences by and large get/would get dominated by the current FBS teams.
you mean like the ACC champs getting beat by a CAA team that didn't even make the playoffs? Arguing that they are automatically inferior is ignoring recent history and the benefits they'll get from a jump to FBS. 20+ scholarships is a big deal too
no way a team like Boise St could make the jump and be competing within a few years. ODU just started football back a couple years ago and are already competing on that level. Give them the same advantages and see what happensWhat is the overall record of FBS teams against FCS teams since the split? JMU's win came five days after Tech traveled to DC to play Boise. Not like the situation was favorable or anything.
Look at how few FBS teams have even sniffed a title. I don't think putting a bunch of FCS teams into the mix would help their chances. 99.99% of the time a team that's already in the upper echelon of FBS teams would win the title. There is zero, none, nil chance that an FCS team would win anything substantial in the same division as the Bamas, USCs, and Tennessees of the world.
Which is why they play in another divisionWhat is the overall record of FBS teams against FCS teams since the split? JMU's win came five days after Tech traveled to DC to play Boise. Not like the situation was favorable or anything.
Look at how few FBS teams have even sniffed a title. I don't think putting a bunch of FCS teams into the mix would help their chances. 99.99% of the time a team that's already in the upper echelon of FBS teams would win the title. There is zero, none, nil chance that an FCS team would win anything substantial in the same division as the Bamas, USCs, and Tennessees of the world.
no way a team like Boise St could make the jump and be competing within a few years. ODU just started football back a couple years ago and are already competing on that level
and they aren't FCS teams anymore and will be on a level playing field.
Tell me the last real surprising, non-traditional powerhouse to win a title.
We've got a group of three or four little upstarts that consistently whip up on weak competition without getting beat up during the regular season who come out winning a handful of big games. That's not impressive.
Did I ever say that? I said those teams would not compete. Historically, they do not. End of story.
then why keep teams like Duke, UK, Vandy, etc around? Do you ever expect them to compete for a title? It seems if the whole qualification process revolves around competing for titles then they can cut lots of teams from FBS
then why keep teams like Duke, UK, Vandy, etc around? Do you ever expect them to compete for a title? It seems if the whole qualification process revolves around competing for titles then they can cut lots of teams from FBS