Offensive Breakdown: Arkansas State

#1

Freak

VolNation's Grand Poobah
Staff member
Joined
Oct 22, 2003
Messages
96,393
Likes
111,265
#1
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#2
#2
There was a similar defensive breakdown thread that I really enjoyed. I know I'd be interested in seeing both after every game if it were something 8188 and others would actually want to do. I know that would be a pretty big time commitment though.
 
#3
#3
Freak, do you plan to post the offensive and defensive plays on YouTube again? If so, I'll rewatch the game once you do and breakdown some plays on here.
 
#5
#5
Here is a nice concept we ran early in the game that ended up in a 56 yard pass from Worley to Pearson.

We're lined up in a trips formation (3 receivers to one side of the QB and a single receiver on the backside). Arkansas State is lined up in their base 4-2-5 defense and is running cover 2. Cover 2 is zone coverage with 2 defenders (usually safeties) covering deep and 5 underneath defenders covering the shorter routes.

We run a dig concept. Our split end (Pig) is going to run a go route, the first slot receiver (Helm) is running a pivot route (fake slant then break out), the second slot receiver (Pearson) is running a dig (deep in route), and the flanker (North) is running a deep post. (Pic 1)

This play is really effective versus cover 2 because of what the pivot route does to the linebackers. Both the middle linebacker and the strongside linebacker see the pivot route in front of them and are often tempted to run down and cover it. However, when they do that it leaves the dig wide open. If the linebackers stay deep to take away the dig then the quarterback can easily check it down to the pivot or to the back. The deep routes by the outside receivers make sure that the safeties can not defend the dig.

Right here, we see the linebackers overreacted to Helm on the pivot route. Both the MLB and the SLB are watching Helm and are starting to flow towards him. Pearson is now wide open on the dig and Worley throws him the ball. (Pic 2)

The free safety could've come down and made the tackle and this would've only been a 15 yard gain, but he takes a really poor angle and Pearson turns it into a 56 yard catch and run. (Pic 3)
 

Attachments

  • H Dig 1.1.jpg
    H Dig 1.1.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 15
  • H Dig 1.2.jpg
    H Dig 1.2.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 11
  • H Dig 1.3.jpg
    H Dig 1.3.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 9
  • Like
Reactions: 21 people
#6
#6
Here is a nice concept we ran early in the game that ended up in a 56 yard pass from Worley to Pearson.

We're lined up in a trips formation (3 receivers to one side of the QB and a single receiver on the backside). Arkansas State is lined up in their base 4-2-5 defense and is running cover 2. Cover 2 is zone coverage with 2 defenders (usually safeties) covering deep and 5 underneath defenders covering the shorter routes.

We run a dig concept. Our split end (Pig) is going to run a go route, the first slot receiver (Helm) is running a pivot route (fake slant then break out), the second slot receiver (Pearson) is running a dig (deep in route), and the flanker (North) is running a deep post. (Pic 1)

This play is really effective versus cover 2 because of what the pivot route does to the linebackers. Both the middle linebacker and the strongside linebacker see the pivot route in front of them and are often tempted to run down and cover it. However, when they do that it leaves the dig wide open. If the linebackers stay deep to take away the dig then the quarterback can easily check it down to the pivot or to the back. The deep routes by the outside receivers make sure that the safeties can not defend the dig.

Right here, we see the linebackers overreacted to Helm on the pivot route. Both the MLB and the SLB are watching Helm and are starting to flow towards him. Pearson is now wide open on the dig and Worley throws him the ball. (Pic 2)

The free safety could've come down and made the tackle and this would've only been a 15 yard gain, but he takes a really poor angle and Pearson turns it into a 56 yard catch and run. (Pic 3)

I don't remember those blank lines on the field
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9
#9
The play at 5:37 caught my eye along with the one Volstopfan14 talked about.

That was also a really well designed play. When you run bubble screens as much as we do, a fake screen like that can really mess with the defense. I like how they used North to clear out the corner then had Pig delay before wheeling up the sideline.

Worley's footwork looked really off on that play. If he could've thrown it better there was a good chance we could score there.
 
#10
#10
Here is a play where poor pass protection from our offensive line potentially cost us a big play.

We are lined up with 2 receivers to each side of Worley and are running "4 verticals" which is exactly what it sounds like. All 4 receivers are running vertical routes. The defense is again in cover 2. That means they will only have 2 deep defenders to cover our 4 receivers. (Pic 1)

On the right side of the ASU defensive line, they have their end and tackle running a stunt with the end coming through the B gap and the tackle through the C gap. (Pic 2)

From the start, Brett Kendrick is off balance and is easily beat by the end. Jackson doesn't recognize the stunt in time to pick up the end. The result? Two defensive linemen are coming free at Worley and Kendrick and Jackson end up blocking no one.

The problem with this is it forces Worley to throw the ball too early. The pass to Smith over the middle is perfect, but in the traffic Smith is unable to hang on to the ball. However, if Worley had more time in the pocket then the play would've been able to develop more. At the time of the release, North is coming open down the right sideline because the deep safety is moving over to cover Smith. With better pass protection and more time in the pocket, this could've been a really big play. Instead, it was thrown too early into traffic and was incomplete. (Pic 4)
 

Attachments

  • 4 Verts 1.1.jpg
    4 Verts 1.1.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 8
  • 4 Verts 1.2.jpg
    4 Verts 1.2.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 5
  • 4 Verts 1.3.jpg
    4 Verts 1.3.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 6
  • 4 Verts 1.4.jpg
    4 Verts 1.4.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 5
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#12
#12
I was interested to see the distributions of rushing results from the first two games and thought you guys might be too. I haven't included sacks in the rushing totals. Better than the blue line is considered an efficient run, and the black dashed line is the average rush (excluding sacks).
 

Attachments

  • UT rushing v. USU.jpg
    UT rushing v. USU.jpg
    51.3 KB · Views: 6
  • UT rushing v. ASU.jpg
    UT rushing v. ASU.jpg
    52.6 KB · Views: 6
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#13
#13
Here is another packaged play that we ran last week vs Utah State then again vs Arkansas State.

We are lined up in a trey formation with our tight end (Wolf) and 2 receivers (North and Pearson) to the right of Worley with a single receiver (Pig) on the backside. Our running back (Hurd), is on the strong side.

The first option on the play is a swing screen for Hurd to the right. Both North and Pearson block the defender in front of them while Wolf is going to get wide then block the defensive end. Hurd runs a swing route and can catch the ball behind his 3 lead blockers.

The second option for Worley is to throw the ball to Pig. He is running an option route on the backside of the play. He will either run a hitch or a fade depending on what the cornerback does. If the corner is playing tight press, then Pig reads that and runs a fade. If the corner bails and plays off coverage, then Pig converts it to a quick hitch. (Pic 1)

Now to explain why this is an effective play. In football, there are 3 basic forms of defensive coverage. Teams will play coverage with either 2 deep safeties, 1 deep safety, or no deep safety. In this example the defense is aligned with 2 deep safeties pre-snap. However, often teams will line up that way but rotate one safety down to the box as soon as the ball is snapped and play a 1 high coverage.

What Worley is going to do on this play is read the strong safety. If the Red Wolves rotate their coverage from having 2 deep safeties to having 1, then the strong safety will come down into the box and the free safety will drop to the deep middle. If that happens, then the defense now has 4 defenders wide to the right side to the offense's 3 blockers. But, with the FS dropping to the deep middle, Pig is now one on one with the corner backside.

On the flip side, if both safeties stay deep, then the free safety now can help the corner defend the fade route to the sideline. But with the strong safety deep, the offense now has enough blockers to block all the ASU defenders on the right.

Cliff notes version of that: If the strong safety runs down to cover Hurd, then Worley will throw to Pig. If the strong safety drops deep, then Worley will throw to Hurd.

Right here, it appears the defense is playing cover 3 (zone coverage. 3 defenders deep, 4 short). Both corners bail and drop into deep coverage, while the free safety drops to the deep middle and the strong safety comes down into the box. Worley sees the strong safety coming down and makes the throw to Pig, who is running a hitch because the corner is dropping deep. (Pic 2)

Pig catches the ball and is able to make the corner miss and ends up gaining 9 yards before he was tackled to set up a 3rd and short. Overall, this is a pretty effective packaged play because it puts the defense in a difficult situation to defend both options.
 

Attachments

  • Swing Hitch 1.1.jpg
    Swing Hitch 1.1.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 2
  • Swing Hitch 1.2.jpg
    Swing Hitch 1.2.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#14
#14
Really outstanding analysis. Any chance you could diagnose what's going on in the run game. Seems like we are always 1 block or making 1 guy miss from making a big gain.
 
#16
#16
The play we ran for our first touchdown vs Arkansas State should be familiar because it is the same concept we used for our first touchdown vs Utah State. The only difference is that instead of bringing a WR in motion for the sweep, we use the back.

8188 did a great job breaking this down last week. This play is pretty simple. OL is blocking zone to the left, RB is running sweep away from the quarterback. This play is often called "bash" or "back away" because the RB is running in the opposite direction of the lines' blocking.

Here Worley is reading the backside defensive end. He jumps inside so Worley hands to Hurd. Wolf gets a good lead block on the SLB and Hurd is able to get to the corner for the touchdown. This is a simple but very effective concept and is obviously something our coaches like in a goal to go situation.
 

Attachments

  • BASH 1.1.jpg
    BASH 1.1.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 1
  • BASH 1.2.jpg
    BASH 1.2.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 1
  • BASH 1.3.jpg
    BASH 1.3.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#17
#17
Here is another scoring play from the ASU game. This also should be familiar as we ran it last week vs USU and I posted about it in that thread.

We are lined up in a trey formation with 2 receivers and a tight end to the left with a single receiver on the right. Last week we looked at the first 4 options on this play. In this game, Worley picked the 5th option and kept the ball himself for a touchdown.

To refresh, these are Worley's 5 options. 1.) Handoff to the back on inside zone right 2.) Throw to the TE on the pop pass 3.) Throw to the slot receiver on the bubble screen 4.) Throw to the backside receiver on a fade 5.) QB keeper to the left

Right here, the defense accounts for everyone but Worley. The SLB comes off the edge on the blitz but comes in so wide that he is ineffective on this play. The SS takes away the bubble screen, the FS covers the pop pass and Malone is well covered on the fade. Worley is left reading the MLB, the last unblocked defender. He jumps into the hole to tackle the RB, so Worley pulls the ball and keeps it himself.

Hurd essentially serves as a lead blocker for Worley as he takes on the hit from the MLB and Worley is able to basically walk in the end zone for a touchdown.

This is a really cool concept and with 5 quick options for Worley, as long as he reads it correctly, we have a really good chance to have success with this play.
 

Attachments

  • IZ Y Pop 1.1.jpg
    IZ Y Pop 1.1.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 0
  • IZ Y Pop 1.2.jpg
    IZ Y Pop 1.2.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 1
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#18
#18
To get into the run game. The more I've rewatched the AState game, the more I am convinced we are not too far away from having an effective running game. One of the biggest problems we have is that on a lot of plays 9 or 10 players execute their jobs well but one poor block or missed assignment leads to a minimal gain or a loss.

Here is an example from early in the game. We line up in formation with two tight ends left and two receivers right and run outside zone to the strong side. (Pic 1) The blocking assignments are simple here. Everyone makes their blocks, except for Brett Kendrick (Pic 2). He lets the DE get around him to make a tackle in the backfield. We see that everyone else is blocked and if the DE had not come free then Hurd is one on one in the open field with a safety. Hurd would be one broken tackle away from a big play. But we never get to that point because of one poor block.

Later in the first half we went back to outside zone. This time we only have one tight end and we're running to the weakside (Pic 4). Everyone makes their blocks except for Kendrick and Mack Crowder. Both linemen get overpowered by the defender in front of them and get driven well back into the backfield. The defensive tackle is able to disengage from Crowder and tackle Devrin Young for a loss. If we could've blocked these 2 players then Young has a lot of room around the edge (Pic 5).

There are a lot more examples I could've used but I just wanted to show these two plays. I think with some more consistency from the line our running game could really improve. Right now there are just too many plays where one (or two) of the lineman gets beat and because of that single miscue we lose yards or get stopped for no gain. As our young linemen grow the consistency should improve. On the negative side, even though Utah State and Arkansas State are good teams, they are among the weakest teams we'll play this year. So the line will need to improve fast or else we could run into serious trouble once we hit the conference slate.

I'll post a few more run plays later to look at the blocking some more.
 

Attachments

  • OZ 1.1.jpg
    OZ 1.1.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 2
  • OZ 1.2.jpg
    OZ 1.2.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 3
  • OZ 1.3.jpg
    OZ 1.3.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 2
  • OZ 4.1.jpg
    OZ 4.1.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 0
  • OZ 4.2.jpg
    OZ 4.2.jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#19
#19
Perhaps my favorite sequence in the AState game was a series of 5 plays that began at the 4:20 mark of the 1st quarter. The Vols called 5 consecutive run plays, executed beautifully, and ended up with a touchdown. This type of smash mouth football is very fun to watch.These plays prove to me that our run game can be effective, we just must improve our consistency.

On the first play we ran inside zone left out of a spread formation with 2 receivers to each side of Worley. Crowder and Kerbyson do a good job opening up a hole and Hurd is able to make the linebacker miss and fall forward for 6 yards.
(Pics 1 and 2)

We run the exact same play again and this time Crowder and Jackson both get a great push and open up a big hole in the middle of the time. Robertson doubles the nose then works to the LB and clears him out. Hurd ends up gaining 10 on the play.
(Pics 3 and 4)

Continued in the next post...
 

Attachments

  • IZ 1.1.jpg
    IZ 1.1.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 0
  • IZ 1.2.jpg
    IZ 1.2.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 0
  • IZ 2.1.jpg
    IZ 2.1.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 0
  • IZ 2.2.jpg
    IZ 2.2.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#20
#20
...Continued from above.

Next we go to a trey formation and run outside zone strong. The line does a good job blocking and Hurd gets around the edge. The safety is able to come down and make a shoestring tackle after a gain of 4. Ultimately not a big gain, but the line did a really good job and Hurd was an inch away from breaking the tackle. (Pics 1 and 2)

After that we lined up in a bunch formation and ran inside zone right with Pearson on a bubble screen. Here Worley is reading the safety to determine if he should hand off or throw to Pearson. This a tough read because the safety is in a position where whatever Worley does there is a decent chance of success. Worley decides to throw to Pearson, but we see that the line did an excellent job blocking anyways. Had Worley handed to Hurd, we likely would've gotten a good gain. Pearson is left one on one in the open field versus the corner. Pearson has a nice move and almost gets into the end zone, but the corner gets a hand on Pearson and he went down at the 4 yard line. (Pics 3 and 4)

Lastly we ran the sweep to Hurd that I posted about earlier (see post #16 for more).

While this is only a small portion of the game, I loved this series of plays. This is what our offense can be when we are clicking. Pure smash mouth football. Our run game has the potential to be good, we just have to be more consistent. Hopefully we can improve and get back to this, because this type of run game is really fun to watch.
 

Attachments

  • OZ 5.1.jpg
    OZ 5.1.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 0
  • OZ 5.2.jpg
    OZ 5.2.jpg
    28.8 KB · Views: 0
  • IZ 3.1.jpg
    IZ 3.1.jpg
    31.2 KB · Views: 0
  • IZ 3.2.jpg
    IZ 3.2.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 2
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#22
#22
Thanks for the breakdowns. Will be interested to see how you guys break down the OK game. The oline started really rough but after rewatching the second half I thought it got a bit better as the game went on.
 

VN Store



Back
Top