Frosty
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2021
- Messages
- 965
- Likes
- 5,375
With the recent exodus of players from USC and UCLA, I’m curious if this hurts them far more in the B1G than it would’ve if they would’ve just stayed in the PAC12 (Which IIRC was more money anyways).
My reasoning for saying it does is now they have depleted rosters, already with no Defense, and heading into one of of the most stout defensive conferences in football. They also both just lost their futures as Malachi Nelson and Dante Moore have both entered the transfer portal. So currently they are moving to a tougher conference with a worse roster.
So what now?
I would argue that with geopolitical factors such as taxation and the already low sports climate in California, this may be the nail in the coffin for these programs.
Curious to see if you think the dissolvement of the of PAC12 basically destroyed these programs as well.
My reasoning for saying it does is now they have depleted rosters, already with no Defense, and heading into one of of the most stout defensive conferences in football. They also both just lost their futures as Malachi Nelson and Dante Moore have both entered the transfer portal. So currently they are moving to a tougher conference with a worse roster.
So what now?
I would argue that with geopolitical factors such as taxation and the already low sports climate in California, this may be the nail in the coffin for these programs.
Curious to see if you think the dissolvement of the of PAC12 basically destroyed these programs as well.