I'm thinking under. Just a hunch though, not based on anything concrete.
The economy has to come back at some point I would assume. Maybe it would happen quicker with a different guy in the white house, but it will bounce back.
It will be over 7% but with the way its factored now and how much he could rig it moving forward it may dip to 5 but be actually 9.
The last figures didnt even include NY and the report before it didnt even include CA.
They are leaving things out of it and they are also not counting people who just gave up.
The way the report is calculated is a joke.
This thread is a farce. The UE number has become a complete joke. It is nothing but a manipulative political tool for whomever is in office.
Actual: 4.7%I'm using 7 as the line.
The chart even says it is "seasonally adjusted". Without defining that.This number can literally be anything they want it to be. My 2012 post said as much
Seasonal adjustment always seems random. I'm sure they have a criteria but no way it's concrete or uniformly applicable to all seasonsThe chart even says it is "seasonally adjusted". Without defining that.
And if you click the link "the employment situation" it goes into a list of all the ways the current data is "adjusted". I dont see a link to the same info from the past but I imagine there were plenty.
The current link says some of jobless from the pandemic are no longer counted.Seasonal adjustment always seems random. I'm sure they have a criteria but no way it's concrete or uniformly applicable to all seasons
Unemployed fall off the ue numbers after a certain length of time. I'd be curious if that was happening now since we're passing a year