Pelosi goes against 9/11 commission recomendation.

#1

gsvol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
14,179
Likes
10
#1
Concerned by reports of the “politicization” of intelligence, the 9/11 commission recommended in July 2004 that the House and Senate intelligence committees be almost evenly balanced, regardless of the number of Republicans and Democrats in Congress.

The Senate intelligence committee currently stands at 8 Democrats and 7 Republicans, and is slated to remain the same this year, despite sharp Democrat gains in November.

The House committee has 12 Democrats and 9 Republicans, but under Pelosi’s new rules, Democrats will increase that margin to 13-8.

When Pelosi took over as Speaker of the House in January 2007, the first piece of legislation she passed was H.R. 1, "Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007.”

In floor debates, the California Democrat was clear to distinguish her party from the Republicans by saying that Democrats favored carrying out the 9/11 commission recommendations in their entirety, whereas Republicans took a more selective approach, arguing that President Bush had already carried out many of the proposed reforms through executive order.

“Going to 13-8,” the new ratio in the House intelligence committee Pelosi announced on Tuesday, “means that she views the Intel committee the same way she views the Rules committee,” which she is ruling “with an iron fist,” Hoekstra said.

Democrats accused the Bush White House of politicizing intelligence on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs, to justify launching the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.

But five years of highly partisan investigation by the Senate intelligence committee failed to turn up any serious evidence of White House meddling with the intelligence process.

Instead, Senate Republicans revealed that a key witness lionized by Democrats for daring to defy the Bush White House in public, turned out to have exaggerated his charges.

Former CIA officer Tyler Drumheller made his allegations of White House tampering with intelligence on CBS’ “60 Minutes” and with other media.

But as revealed in “Shadow Warriors: The Untold Story of Traitors, Saboteurs, and the Party of Surrender,” Senate Republicans issued a stunning and unprecedented rebuke that essentially called Drumheller a liar.

After re-examining the entire classified record and re-interviewing former CIA Director George Tenet and other CIA officials involved in the operations that Drumheller disclosed publicly, the committee concluded that Drumheller had “mischaracterized” much of the information he claimed showed White House politicization of intelligence.

“The committee is still exploring why [Drumheller]’s public remarks differ so markedly from the documentation,” a September 2006 Senate Selective Intelligence Committee report concluded.
 
#4
#4
Crikes! Thank God George Bush never ignored the 9/11 Commission recommendations!

Oh, wait ...
 
#5
#5
pelosi2-thumb.jpg


pelosi_in_hijab_2.jpg


4_66_040507_pelosi_sheik.jpg


pelosi-topper.jpg


610x.jpg


pelosi-in-syria.gif


Zoepf-PelosiAssad1H.jpg
 
#6
#6
Pelosi is a goofy looking yahoo. Never really noticed that before.
 
#7
#7
Crikes! Thank God George Bush never ignored the 9/11 Commission recommendations!

Oh, wait ...
you apparently missed her proud moments declaring herself chief commission follower in the past.

Don't let that get in the way of you pointing out the hypocrisy on the right, though. Your point is a good one.
 
#8
#8
you apparently missed her proud moments declaring herself chief commission follower in the past.

Don't let that get in the way of you pointing out the hypocrisy on the right, though. Your point is a good one.


In all candor, and to be fair, I don't expect either Bush or Congress to follow each recommendation of ANY commission or agency. They both should exercise their judgment and weigh the alternatives, as appropriate.

The debate ought to be over whether the particular recommendation is good policy. And reasonable people can differ, whether its Bush or Pelosi making the decision.
 
#9
#9
In all candor, and to be fair, I don't expect either Bush or Congress to follow each recommendation of ANY commission or agency. They both should exercise their judgment and weigh the alternatives, as appropriate.

The debate ought to be over whether the particular recommendation is good policy. And reasonable people can differ, whether its Bush or Pelosi making the decision.
the recommendation is absolutely good policy. Anything that would make an intel committee less partisan needs to happen, period. All she has done is refuse to make it a viable committee.
 
#16
#16
You guys are assuming a lot about her motivations.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
then what on earth would the rationale be for making it even more lopsided. It was already problematic and now it's going to be worse. She can gerrymander around with meaningless crap like Ways and Means. Intel is no place to have a dumbass Pol with a vendetta meddling around.

I don't care her reasoning in the least. It's dead wrong and she needs to fix it. Rather than doing a psyche profile like you would a blatant murderer, you should be bitching that she's a moron, just like everyone with half a brain is doing.
 
#17
#17
Pelosi is the wrong person to have in the leadership, but it's what we have to deal with. This move is wrong...but it's just one of many to come in the new congress.
 

VN Store



Back
Top