His argument gets more pathetic with each post. He not only is ignorant of the facts, but now he's just making up ridiculous garbage like that.
What do you know lawvol? I have been saying that for how long now?
depends on how it was told to him. I really do not think anybody knows exactly what was told to him. Now if it comes back that he was told very graphically bad things then there should of been some urgency in what was told to AD etc.
It all really depends on the guy who saw it in my honest opinion.
You've not said that once that I've seen. You're saying Paterno had done all that was required of him "ethically." Groves is saying he did everything required of him "legally." I know that's very difficult for someone like yourself to understand that.
Thats because your to stupid to go back and look before clicking on last page.
No it does not. If the least that Joe Paterno knew was that Sandusky was alone in the locker room shower with a 10 year old boy then that is enough to go to the PROPER authorities.
You act like Paterno is some backwoods hillbilly incapable of understanding the scenario placed before him. He is an Ivy league graduate. He knew that Sandusky was being investigated for molesting a child in 98. He is no moron. He knew exactly what was going on no matter what he was told.
"Sandusky alone in shower with small boy"
That's it. He needed to call the President, the chief of the PD, the university chaplain, the g*d-d**n janitor. He needed to get some people out there to find that boy and get him out of harms way.
Where in the hell is common decency? Unbelievable!
You're right. You haven't spent your entire time here claiming that Paterno is the only one that satisfied his "ethical obligations." Or that Paterno did all that was required of him "ethically." My God, you really are one of the more pathetic posters I've had the opportunity to read on here.
boy
shower
fondling
put those words together and it really takes a different kind of person not to immediately call the real police
I wanna understand your ethical knowledge so I will pose the same question as I did for a guy earlier.
You own a business where somebody has been robbed in the last year are you ethically required to put a warning sign up?
I wanna understand your ethical knowledge so I will pose the same question as I did for a guy earlier.
You own a business where somebody has been robbed in the last year are you ethically required to put a warning sign up?
I wanna understand your ethical knowledge so I will pose the same question as I did for a guy earlier.
You own a business where somebody has been robbed in the last year are you ethically required to put a warning sign up?