NWGVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Messages
- 716
- Likes
- 433
My employer, which is very large and prominent, has policies for its employees. For business issues, report it to your supervisor. For ethical issues, report it to your site Ethics Officer. For legal issues, report it to your site Legal Organization. Its then up to those groups to determine the next action and whether outside organizations (like the Police) need to be pulled in. They will conduct follow up contact with the person reported as needed. Its quite possible McQueary met all the expectations of his employer in this situation and that is why his employer has not changed his status.With all due respect, you don't have a clue what you would have done in McQueary's situation, and unless you are in your 70's, a WWII veteran, and a 50 year employee and Head Football Coach at Penn State you don't have a clue what you would have done. Its all just wild speculation.
he should have called the cops but the only slight out that I give him is that he went to Paterno. For a guy his age in State College PA, that's like telling God.
Not Sad, but pathetic?
I cannot see how a rational, educated person, cannot look at the facts of the case and see that when you allow a person that has committed such crimes to continue to be around the campus and facilities, is somehow not partially responsible.
You guys keep killing me with your own contradictions. What is it, burn him at the stake, or hold him "partially responsible?"
I never said JP wasn't partially at fault here, but there is much much information that we don't know and don't understand that one can only speculate about. There is a much bigger story here than Paterno and having visited State College its not out of realm of possibility that Paterno, at his age, simply developed a mental block concerning this whole situation, and wrongly trusted the administration to do the right thing. Now, in retrospect was that the correct course of action? Well Paterno thought so and since none of you are in his shoes or even understand his thought process, or have a friggin clue what was going on behind closed doors at Penn State since you dont have the information, calling for his head is a little premature.
Yeah, but how on earth can you go the next 9 years seeing Sandusky on campus all the time after what he witnessed? And with Sandusky escorting more young boys around at that. I just can't wrap my head around it...
You would stop it, but have no problem with someone who could have stopped it , but did little to nothing to stop it?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Not Sad, but pathetic?
I cannot see how a rational, educated person, cannot look at the facts of the case and see that when you allow a person that has committed such crimes to continue to be around the campus and facilities, is somehow not partially responsible.
My employer, which is very large and prominent, has policies for its employees. For business issues, report it to your supervisor. For ethical issues, report it to your site Ethics Officer. For legal issues, report it to your site Legal Organization. Its then up to those groups to determine the next action and whether outside organizations (like the Police) need to be pulled in. They will conduct follow up contact with the person reported as needed. Its quite possible McQueary met all the expectations of his employer in this situation and that is why his employer has not changed his status.
OK, I get that 100%. Been there too. However, even with these written policies in place, if an employee jumps the chain of command by going to an "ethics officer" with an issue, it is entirely possible that he himself is compromising his own job status. Yep, I'm going with that.
Again, you guys dont have a clue what you're talking about. I agree he "could" have done more, but as usual you guys are missing the bigger story here.
I am quite sure that this whole episode going back to 98 is absolutely abhorrent to Paterno, I've also been to State College and I doubt many around here have. Not much there but the university. I also doubt that the subject of pedophilia is directly in Joe's wheelhouse. Its pretty obvious that JP wanted to stay as far away from this as possible and allow the administration to get their hands dirty if necessary. Now, is that doing everything.... no. Do I believe that JP intentionally avoided getting his hands dirty.... yes. But still, this is a massive coverup, bigger than a lot of people recognize and your focus on stringing up Paterno is all wrong. Sorry.
How do u draw that conclusion? Pretty upset with janitor, da, ad, and grad asst. Paterno should have done more of course but he is getting lions share of blame which isnt right.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Because we are rational and educated.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Surely you are not insinuating that Paterno could have been concerned about his job status as a reason for not calling the police.
Surely you are not insinuating that Paterno could have been concerned about his job status as a reason for not calling the police.
OK, I get that 100%. Been there too. However, even with these written policies in place, if an employee jumps the chain of command by going to an "ethics officer" with an issue, it is entirely possible that he himself is compromising his own job status. Yep, I'm going with that.
We all know that both Paterno and McQueary met the standards that were/are in place. What we dont know is the breadth of the umbrella of conspiracy and corruption at the administrative level.
OK, I get that 100%. Been there too. However, even with these written policies in place, if an employee jumps the chain of command by going to an "ethics officer" with an issue, it is entirely possible that he himself is compromising his own job status. Yep, I'm going with that.
We all know that both Paterno and McQueary met the standards that were/are in place. What we dont know is the breadth of the umbrella of conspiracy and corruption at the administrative level.