Princess Leia

#1

wounded mullet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
13,951
Likes
11
#1
So I'm getting home and watching Episode IV on Spike ( I know, what are the chances Spike has one of the Star Wars movies on) and i'm looking at Carrie Fisher. Obviously she didn't age that well but what was the appeal in the first place? I'm knee deep in Jack D right now and I just still don't see the appeal in
her. Now the right girl in those outfits and it's a match made in heaven. So as a SW fan I'm going to come out and say this.Princess Leia was miscast. If you agree with me, who should have played that pivotal role back in 77?
 
#8
#8
the new ones had Natalie Portman and they sucked so Carrie Fisher is okay for me.
 
#9
#9
Would slam

Now, after reading, no clue.

I am not one of these guys who thinks anything below an 8 is below my standard. God knows i have had some questionable one night stands in my life. I'm just saying that to me she wasn't a likable character visually. Hell she was just unlikeable even in her demeanor to me. I just think they could have found a more strong willed, snippy likable princess with less neck fat. I have had arguments that Fisher was a worse cast than Hamill, he is a horrible actor yes, but he played the clueless innocent Jedi role perfectly.
 
Last edited:
#11
#11
What's better, Hamill's portrayal of the clueless Jedi or your intoxicated spelling?
 
#20
#20
bruh...get it right :)
1897cool_story_brah_cat.jpg
 
#23
#23
Erin Grey was pretty hot, but the chick who played the Draconian princess was hot in that trashy sort of way.
 

VN Store



Back
Top