Private school good enough for obama's children, but not poor blacks

#1

droski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
21,914
Likes
3
#1
Will Barack Obama Let Democrats Dismantle the Opportunity Scholarship Program? - WSJ.com

President Obama made education a big part of his speech Tuesday night, complete with a stirring call for reform. So we'll be curious to see how he handles the dismaying attempt by Democrats in Congress to crush education choice for 1,700 poor kids in the District of Columbia.

The omnibus spending bill now moving through the House includes language designed to kill the Opportunity Scholarship Program offering vouchers for poor students to opt out of rotten public schools. The legislation says no federal funds can be used on the program beyond 2010 unless Congress and the D.C. City Council reauthorize it. Given that Democrats control both bodies -- and that their union backers hate school choice -- this amounts to a death sentence.
op-eds of the day from your blog or Web page.
Republicans passed the program in 2004, with help from Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein, and it has been extremely popular. Families receive up to $7,500 a year to attend the school of their choice. That's a real bargain, given that D.C. public schools spend $14,400 per pupil on average, among the most in the country.

To qualify, a student's household income must be at or below 185% of the poverty level. Some 99% of the participants are minority, and the average annual income is $23,000 for a family of four. A 2008 Department of Education evaluation found that participants had higher reading scores than their peers who didn't receive a scholarship, and there are four applicants for each voucher.
 
#2
#2
This program sounds completely like Obama himself wrote it. Will be very interesting to see if this becomes another example of his hypocrisy.
 
#3
#3
The key part: "Families receive up to $7,500 a year to attend the school of their choice. That's a real bargain, given that D.C. public schools spend $14,400 per pupil on average, among the most in the country."

God forbid we save money and do something good too. Obama is sure in the pocket of the teachers union.
 
#4
#4
Honestly, other than being in bed with the teacher's union, I can't think of one legitimate argument why this is bad.

Maybe because it takes money from the public sector and gives it to the private sector? Is that their argument?
 
#5
#5
the argument is that it worsens the public schools because they will have less funding which is of course a ridiculous argument.
 
#6
#6
But they don't have to worry about funding anymore. We are handing out money like santa throws candy at a Christmas parade
 
#7
#7
the argument is that it worsens the public schools because they will have less funding which is of course a ridiculous argument.

Exactly. The local media here pushes that the budget is based on per student basis, so any voucher or rebate program "steals money" from the public school system. Then they turn to say that the public school system needs billions of dollars to fix the existing buildings/etc. because all the money has only been going to the best schools. A classic example of spending too much money then claiming the only way to rectify the problem is even more spending.
 
Last edited:
#8
#8
just the fact that most private schools spend half the money on administration as public schools shows that lack of funding isn't the problem here.
 
#9
#9
Public education should be eliminated altogether. The government should implement a voucher program like this for all children.
 
#10
#10
Public education should be eliminated altogether. The government should implement a voucher program like this for all children.

keep public education, just take it out of the hands of the federal government and place it in the states' hands. There's no good reason why tax dollars designated for education must first be filtered through the DC bureaucracy.

Get rid of the NEA and AFT as well.
 
#11
#11
keep public education, just take it out of the hands of the federal government and place it in the states' hands. There's no good reason why tax dollars designated for education must first be filtered through the DC bureaucracy.

Get rid of the NEA and AFT as well.
while Obama's in office? don't be silly.
 
#13
#13
National Educator Association and American Federation of Teachers. Two massive and destructive unions.
 
#15
#15
Thanks. If they are unions I am probably against them.

they are unions, and I believe both are based in Washington DC, where they have massive lobbying arms.

If you decide to dig further, the lowest paid official in the NEA's offices makes over 100 grand/year, compare that to the teachers they are alleged to represent.
 
#16
#16
Dick Durbin has a nasty surprise for two of Sasha and Malia Obama's new schoolmates. And it puts the president in an awkward position.

Virginia Walden-Ford, executive director of D.C. Parents for School Choice, wouldn't mind making a few more politicians bristle. "I'd like to see a reporter stand up at one of those nationally televised press conferences and ask President Obama what he thinks about what his own party is doing to keep two innocent kids from attending the same school where he sends his?"

William McGurn Says Barack Obama Is Upholding a Double Standard on School Vouchers - WSJ.com

Since these kids' parents probably voted for Obama, I wonder if they are regretting that now.
 
#17
#17
little Dick Durbin has been due a nasty surprise ever since he traveled to Iraq and became a useful idiot for Saddam Hussein.
 
#18
#18
little Dick Durbin has been due a nasty surprise ever since he traveled to Iraq and became a useful idiot for Saddam Hussein.

I know he was a big anti-war guy, but what exactly are you referring to here. When he said that he had classified information that America was being misled into the Iraqi war?
 
#19
#19
he and a few other Congressional democrats traveled to Baghdad in 92 or 93 and publicly protested Bush's increasing level of hostility toward Iraq.
 

VN Store



Back
Top