Question about your 1 QB plan now

#1

LSUfreak

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
34
Likes
0
#1
What happens if/when your QB (dont know who he is, but I think he is a Soph) for Sat night completely tanks. I mean, like 3-18 and 3 INT's performance.

Do you guys yank him even though Fulmer has vowed to stick with one QB?

Just curious how committed you guys think your coach is to sticking to one QB

tigerstadium03-07.jpg


-------------------
http://www.tigersmack.com/boards

 
#2
#2
Yeah... But I don't know any other team that wouldn't yank their QB after a performance like that.
 
#4
#4
Originally posted by IBleedOrange24/7@Sep 20, 2005 1:00 AM
Did LSU grow a secondary ?
[snapback]147420[/snapback]​




You guys get a QB and then you come talk to us about our secondary.

If its a shootout, you guys are toast
 
#5
#5
Originally posted by LSUfreak@Sep 20, 2005 12:08 AM
You guys get a QB


Our QB beat UGA last year and made the SECCG

How did yours do against them?
 
#6
#6
I saw the ASU game. Maybe the Saints will loan you there secondary since your without one.
 
#10
#10
Originally posted by LSUfreak@Sep 20, 2005 1:08 AM
You guys get a QB and then you come talk to us about our secondary.

If its a shootout, you guys are toast
[snapback]147423[/snapback]​



Wont happen. Did ya notice that nobody on any message board is complaining about the UT defense?
 
#11
#11
Originally posted by U-T@Sep 20, 2005 1:46 AM
Our QB beat UGA last year and made the SECCG

How did yours do against them?
[snapback]147427[/snapback]​



last year?

you're talking about LAST year?


pffftttt

wake up...last year means squat
 
#12
#12
Convenient that you only bring up the past win it supports your arguement. you cant ignore the past - if that was the case then why would you even consider your QB selection?
 
#13
#13
Originally posted by VOLracerx@Sep 20, 2005 11:20 AM
Convenient that you only bring up the past win it supports your arguement. you cant ignore the past - if that was the case then why would you even consider your QB selection?
[snapback]147544[/snapback]​




What are you...drunken Confucius’s brother?

The only people caught up on the past are the Bama fans. History wont help you as LSU hangs 42 points on your team.
 
#14
#14
Originally posted by LSUfreak@Sep 20, 2005 11:24 AM
History wont help you as LSU hangs 42 points on your team.
[snapback]147548[/snapback]​


Im gonna save that on my sig, just so that when you lurk here after Saturdays game, you will remember why you arent showing your face. :biggrin2:
 
#16
#16
SO - are you gonna have your special teams on the field the whole time?? Cuz - from the game I watched that is the only way you guys know how to score. (not that we have much room to talk)

To answer you question - i think CPF needs to stick with his decision UNLESS it gets out of hand with the mistakes. I am tired of this switheroo thing they have going. i am sure you have lots of experience with that too - Ainge is definately talented enough to beat you guys - that I am sure of- it all depends on whether or not he and the recievers are on the same page.

 
#17
#17
Originally posted by LSUfreak@Sep 20, 2005 1:08 AM
You guys get a QB and then you come talk to us about our secondary.

If its a shootout, you guys are toast
[snapback]147423[/snapback]​

I love this smack talkin.... our triumph will be that much greater!
 
#18
#18
Originally posted by LSUfreak@Sep 20, 2005 1:33 AM
What happens if/when your QB (dont know who he is, but I think he is a Soph) for Sat night completely tanks.  I mean, like 3-18 and 3 INT's performance.

Do you guys yank him even though Fulmer has vowed to stick with one QB?

Just curious how committed you guys think your coach is to sticking to one QB

tigerstadium03-07.jpg


-------------------
http://www.tigersmack.com/boards
[snapback]147411[/snapback]​

LSU fans, do they not have there own forum,

Not funny
 
#19
#19
Thanks GA , I was about to flame all over that one, LSUfraud is annoyying but that was uncalled for.
 
#20
#20
I think it's the right decision and the wrong quarterback- but in this case the decision is way more important than which quarterback we go with.

Fulmer responded to the question about why he put in Clausen at the end of the 2nd quarter with a glib, "Because we've got two quarterbacks, so we're going to play them"- an answer that looked assanine when he didn't play Clausen again the whole night.

Last year was a different year, and the kids had nothing to lose, so switching back and forth didn't phaze them. This year, messing around and changing quarterbacks just because it's the 3rd series, or because "we've got 2 quarterbacks" messes with the whole offense's minds and rhythm.

I still think Ainge is young mentally & it shows, and therefore Clausen should be our #1, but Ainge as clear #1 is still about the smartest thing Fulmer has done since Spring Camp started.......
 

VN Store



Back
Top