Ulysees E. McGill
This season is for you Sweets
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 55,110
- Likes
- 145,642
i was truly shocked that Bates never was even close to a factor at UT. He was a consensus top 100 (maybe top 75) player and literally never did anything but play some special teamsBates sucked. He never factored in. I donāt care what he was ārecruited forā (as if guys are recruited not to man a spot? He was recruited to compete like everyone else). Kirkland did factor in.
Bizarre conversation.
Anyway, the depth chart from 2015 is included in here. Yes, DK eventually passed him.
2015 Tennessee Volunteers football team - Wikipedia
Realistically, I see 9-3. Losses to Bama, Georgia, and one of LSU or Pitt. There is a good chance for 10-2 if we get all the breaks. I dont think we have the depth to compete for a full game with Bama and Georgia, yet. If this class remains as good as it is and we get another good class the following year, we will be able to surprise the Bamas and Georgias of the world.
They are a good football program under Narduzzi....losing to them doesn't merit an excuse. Yeah they lost some stuff, but they got a lot of good players coming back and picked up some good pieces to offset loss....that ain't excuses, it is a f'n fact.Lost their QB and their top WR. We really should beat them. No excuses.
I envy your optimism. I want us to get that 15-0 more than just about anything.I see it differently. They still sometimes slip up and loose one that they shouldnāt. We are so overdue for the good karmaā¦I am considering all games a win until proven otherwise.
15-0
View attachment 475862
Loving your vacation photos. I hope one day to visit somewhere as scenic as RMNP. Gotta kick these kids outta my house first and quit working so much!View attachment 475864View attachment 475865View attachment 475866
Returning from RMNP. Just beautiful landscape everywhere here.
Never change eeyore...errr.. I mean McGill! Gotta have some levity around here!They are a good football program under Narduzzi....losing to them doesn't merit an excuse. Yeah they lost some stuff, but they got a lot of good players coming back and picked up some good pieces to offset loss....that ain't excuses, it is a f'n fact.
Tiger is an icon that has made the overall game of golf billions because he did amazing things that nobody besides Jack could do...women are not and will not ever be able to do those things. A freaking high school boys soccer team beat the womens national team for craps sake...it has absolutely nothing to do with personality, it has everything to do with genetics.
No woman will ever be able to come close to the physical dominance of the greatest male athletes...without being genetically enhanced or some dude that claims to be a woman gets accepted.
So, you can't drive by a school and moon it from the car window, but you can moon a school bus from your bedroom window? Asking for @WeezerI reviewed the statute for public indecency and indecent exposure. I feel confident that they donāt include your property in areas where the public canāt really view you. The public indecency clearly states, āpremises used solely as a private residenceā¦are not deemed to be a public place.ā The indecent exposure statute includes a āresident of another,ā so not your own.
I think you went too far with your argument. I agree with your overall point, but saying lack of testosterone (which I assume is a slang way of saying women are less athletically gifted than men) isn't one of the reasons women's sports are far behind isn't true. It is one of the reasons, and is the main reason women's sports will never be as entertaining to most people. It isn't the only reason women's sports are far behind, and those other reasons can and should be addressed; but to say the athleticism gap has nothing to do with it is just taking your argument too far, in my opinion.I love ya man (you're my Vol fam) but you and a few others miss the point completely on this. No one is gonna force you to watch something you don't want to. However, don't give me so and so is this or males are "the best" and that's why we watch argument. We've supported a subpar product forever and will continue to. We watch children play for heaven's sake and I don't mean college kids.
Women's sports aren't about what men can do and shouldn't be just like college sports shouldn't be about what pros can do. The WNBA and women's sports in general are far behind but it's for many, many reasons none of which include men being physically gifted with testosterone. Regardless of your stance though, I think we can all agree that the goal is to get them better.
Imo the biggest problem the WNBA has is they try to play like men and fail miserablyI love ya man (you're my Vol fam) but you and a few others miss the point completely on this. No one is gonna force you to watch something you don't want to. However, don't give me so and so is this or males are "the best" and that's why we watch argument. We've supported a subpar product forever and will continue to even when that product wins a championship because under that logic we should only be watching the pros. We watch children play for heaven's sake and I don't mean college kids.
Women's sports aren't about what men can do and shouldn't be just like college sports shouldn't be about what pros can do. The WNBA and women's sports in general are far behind but it's for many, many reasons none of which include men being physically gifted with testosterone. Regardless of your stance though, I think we can all agree that the goal is to get them better.
I would say that is a bit different. Thatās in public. Canāt say that Iāve defended many things like this, but the statute states that it has to be in a public place (or private residence of āanotherā) and your private residence is not included in that.
It also has to been seen by someone, and your backyard would be private. Now if a person lives on a busy street and decides to go out to their front yard, it might get interesting.
I think you went too far with your argument. I agree with your overall point, but saying lack of testosterone (which I assume is a slang way of saying women are less athletically gifted than men) isn't one of the reasons women's sports are far behind isn't true. It is one of the reasons, and is the main reason women's sports will never be as entertaining to most people. It isn't the only reason women's sports are far behind, and those other reasons can and should be addressed; but to say the athleticism gap has nothing to do with it is just taking your argument too far, in my opinion.
Loving your vacation photos. I hope one day to visit somewhere as scenic as RMNP. Gotta kick these kids outta my house first and quit working so much!