Btw, I would guess the vast majority of our players were more highly regarded recruits than UMs and they made our team look down right pathetic. . . .
. . . we have talent on this team that just got smoked by players much less regarded as recruits, by and large. . . .
I'm not picking on any one in particular, but I see these sorts of posts over and over, and it just doesn't represent reality. I think the 24/7 internet and college football recruiting coverage has ruined people's perspective.
"Talent" is an elusive word. In the college football arena, it is almost synonymous to "potential." It just doesn't translate directly to the next level. There is no guarantee whatsoever that a "talented" recruit is going to a GOOD football player. Very, very few of them show up that way. They have to be made into a good football player.
Unless you are one of the top 2-3 percent that are freakishly gifted athletically, it's going to take some training and development to be competitive at the D-I level - no matter how many stars you had by your name in high school.
There's just so much more to it than your stars. Those stars offer no insight at all into your work ethic, toughness, perseverance, mental aptitude, character, emotional stability, etc. There are very few players signing to play D1 that weren't the best player on their team in HS. Many were the best player in their league. For most all of them, they dominated at the HS level with almost no effort. Every time you move up, some excel, other digress. Something is going to be exposed. You see the same phenomena from college to the NFL.
Any player who has been in the UT program for the last few years has been tugged every which way. Each new set of coaches has new language and different expectations. Just think of how much time has been lost with each transition. How much lifting and running do you think was missed by many when they didn't even know who the coach was going to be?
There is a LOT of value the stability of a program and a particular "system." If someone can't at least consider that a 3-star player with 3-5 years of training, lifting and practice in the same system might have a competitive advantage over a 4 or 5 star player with 1-2 years training and one year in a system, then they don't have a lot of applicable experience with the game of football.