RNC passes resolution vs UN Agenda 21.

[gsvol]

BREAKING: New Media Alert: RNC passes Resolution Exposing UN Agenda 21, ICLEI and "Sustainable Development", **unanimously** - We The People USA

Why did we not hear about this anywhere, in debates, press releases? The silence and deer-in-the-headlight stares we get from GOP elected officials when we inquire about Agenda 21 are becoming increasingly suspect as an artifice of deceit. How can they all not know, and what is this "code of silence" about anything having to do with UN Agenda 21 or Sustainable Development?

Subject: Agenda 21

Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:36:57 -0500

From: Carolyn McLarty

To: Robert Semands

Hi Robert, The Resolution Exposing UN Agenda 21 passed unamended through the full RNC yesterday! It was a very good day. Thanks for sharing the information. Carolyn

Carolyn L. McLarty, DVM Republican National Committeewoman for Oklahoma

Resolution Exposing United Nations Agenda 21

WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering and global political control, that was initiated at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992; and,

WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is being covertly pushed into local communities throughout the United States of America through the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) through local “sustainable development” policies such as Smart Growth, Wildlands Project, Resilient Cities, Regional Visioning Projects, and other “Green” or “Alternative” projects; and,

WHEREAS, this United Nations Agenda 21 plan of radical so-called “sustainable development” views the American way of life of private property ownership, singlefamily homes, private car ownership and individual travel choices, and privately owned farms; all as destructive to the environment; and,

WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy, social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment which would be accomplished by socialist/communist redistribution of wealth; and,

WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy National sovereignty is deemed a social injustice; now therefore be

RESOLVED, the Republican National Committee recognizes the destructive and insidious nature of United Nations Agenda 21 and hereby exposes to the public and public policy makers the dangerous intent of the plan; and therefore be it further

RESOLVED , that the U.S. government and no state or local government is legally bound by the United Nations Agenda 21 treaty in that it has never been endorsed by the (U.S.) Senate, and therefore be it further

RESOLVED, that the federal and state and local governments across the country be well informed of the underlying harmful implications of implementation of United Nations Agenda 21 destructive strategies for “sustainable development” and we hereby endorse rejection of its radical policies and rejection of any grant monies attached to it.

 

[lawgator1]

If it isn't binding and has no effect, who gives a crap (besides alarmist tin foil types) ?

 

[gsvol]

Here are a few million reasons:

NOlathe's Blog

Obama Funding ICLEI And “Sustainable Development” $71,480,165 Just Through HUD In 2011.

“The Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Program supports metropolitan and multijurisdictional planning efforts that integrate housing, land use, economic and workforce development, transportation, and infrastructure investments in a manner that empowers jurisdictions to consider the interdependent challenges of:

(1) economic competitiveness and revitalization;

(2) social equity, inclusion, and access to opportunity;

(3) energy use and climate change; and

(4) public health and environmental impact.

The Program places a priority on investing in partnerships, including nontraditional partnerships (e.g., arts and culture, recreation, public health, food systems, regional planning agencies and public education entities) that translate the Federal Livability Principles into strategies that direct long-term development and reinvestment, demonstrate a commitment to addressing issues of regional significance, use data to set and monitor progress toward performance goals, and engage stakeholders and residents in meaningful decision-making roles.

The Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Program is being initiated in close coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), co-leaders with HUD in the Partnership for Sustainable Communities.” Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grants

Details of the 2011 HUD Sustainable Communities Grant funding by State accessed here Hud Doc totalled $71,480,165 (printed/borrowed plus interest).

That's just one of many examples I could provide.

Tin foil? I have a hard time deciding whether you are incredibly dense or are a total airhead.

 

[milohimself]

The real reason they're against agenda 21 is because it threatens monsanto.

 

[milohimself]

The real reason they're against agenda 21 is because it threatens monsanto.

The difference between them and the un is monsanto pays politicians, many in the republican party, to let them **** americans out of their land and livelihood.

 

[gsvol]

The difference between them and the un is monsanto pays politicians, many in the republican party, to let them **** americans out of their land and livelihood.

Talking to yourself now?

I hope you don't consider that intelligent conversation. :loco:

Correction, it wasn't the RNC that passed the resolution, it was the NFRA.

History | National Federation of Republican Assemblies (NFRA)

We are the "Republican Wing of the Republican Party" . The NFRA stands for principle, the United States Constitution and for conservative values. Unlike the RINOs, we know that more government means less freedom.

Milo, if you don't think the same people who own Monsanto et al are not the same people directing the UN, then you are sadly misinformed.

FWIW, the RNC hasn't called me in five years asking for a donation, my message then was mostly that they have become about the same as the DNC for all practical purposes.

Thank God for NFRA, the Tea Party and all other anti-statists.

 

[milohimself]

Not familiar with the NFRA or who its members are. If it's them and not the RNC, then that changes the equation. However I would be very interested to see the names of any particular federal representatives who have taken a public stance against Agenda 21 and cross reference that to see if they have worked or endorsed legislation drafted by the agricultural industrial lobby.

Also, I'd be very interested to see any credible sources on the presence of Monsanto in the upper levels of the UN, as they have been at odds with each other on a consistent basis. European countries, the EU and their UN delegates has been Monsanto's single biggest hurdle ever since they switched from chemical manufacturing the agriculture.

 

[gsvol]

Not familiar with the NFRA or who its members are. If it's them and not the RNC, then that changes the equation. However I would be very interested to see the names of any particular federal representatives who have taken a public stance against Agenda 21 and cross reference that to see if they have worked or endorsed legislation drafted by the agricultural industrial lobby.

Also, I'd be very interested to see any credible sources on the presence of Monsanto in the upper levels of the UN, as they have been at odds with each other on a consistent basis. European countries, the EU and their UN delegates has been Monsanto's single biggest hurdle ever since they switched from chemical manufacturing the agriculture.

So then you support Agenda 21?

It also has to do with negating our 2nd amendment rights because that is always the desire and objective of socialists, to disarm the citizenry in order to obtain complete control.



Armed Self Defense: Just Say NO To The UN… A UN Allied Group Declares War On Your Firearms Rights & Senator Rand Paul

“Global Action to Prevent War,” is an allied organization recognized by the United Nations in their continuing effort to strip Americans of their right to Keep and Bear arms. The UN gives support to organizations such as the GAPW, which, according to their website, is putting forth a radical plan of Global Governance. They join with groups like the “International Action Network on Small Arms,” (IANSA) both of which are trying to foist upon us the UN’s “Arms Trade Treaty” and “Programme of Action on Small Arms.”

Groups like the these have a history of trying to destroy our sovereignty and are the same kinds of organizations that joined the UN in trying to coerce the United States into tossing our Constitution and joining the UN sponsored International Criminal Court in the early 1990’s. Although Bill Clinton signed off on this Treaty, he refused to recommend the International Court Treaty to the Senate. George W. Bush fought this and other anti freedom UN treaties outright by appointing the tenacious Ambassador John Bolton to the UN.

 

[milohimself]

So then you support Agenda 21?

It also has to do with negating our 2nd amendment rights because that is always the desire and objective of socialists, to disarm the citizenry in order to obtain complete control.

McCarthy, is that you?

Suppose you could provide me a scholarly link on how elimination of gun rights is a desired goal of socialists? I'm sure the Moslems are involved somehow as well, a link to that would be swell.

Before I go on to this next part, I am actually now a gun owner and have considered myself a proponent of 2nd amendment rights. I believe in unlimited gun ownership with the sole exception of fully automatic assault weapons.

As for Obama, while he did have a stronger regulatory stance in Illinois, it has transpired to absolutely nothing during his time as president.

I would like to make this first point as up front as possible:

- Gun control advocacy groups have given the Obama administration a unanimous failing grade.
- The Obama administration did not pursue to take the Clinton assault weapon ban back up
- The only thing that is even kind of in the same area code as a gun control act that this admin has taken is their supreme court appointments, however his two so far have been replacements for two who were already gun control advocates.
- Even Wayne LaPierre has resorted to straw man arguments:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aELb5ub1oE[/youtube]

I'll end this by saying that I have three close family members (mom, brother and brother-in-law) who are active NRA members, and about half a dozen friends who are as well (current or former military). All of them were worried about gun rights during the 2008 election, but every one of them has conceded that ultimately nothing has come of it.

Not sure why I spent all that time on it knowing that you're going to wholly disregard my post and/or change the subject without really replying to anything I just wrote, but there you go.

 

[gsvol]

McCarthy, is that you?

Suppose you could provide me a scholarly link on how elimination of gun rights is a desired goal of socialists? I'm sure the Moslems are involved somehow as well, a link to that would be swell.

Before I go on to this next part, I am actually now a gun owner and have considered myself a proponent of 2nd amendment rights. I believe in unlimited gun ownership with the sole exception of fully automatic assault weapons.

As for Obama, while he did have a stronger regulatory stance in Illinois, it has transpired to absolutely nothing during his time as president.

I would like to make this first point as up front as possible:

- Gun control advocacy groups have given the Obama administration a unanimous failing grade.
- The Obama administration did not pursue to take the Clinton assault weapon ban back up
- The only thing that is even kind of in the same area code as a gun control act that this admin has taken is their supreme court appointments, however his two so far have been replacements for two who were already gun control advocates.
- Even Wayne LaPierre has resorted to straw man arguments:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aELb5ub1oE[/youtube]

I'll end this by saying that I have three close family members (mom, brother and brother-in-law) who are active NRA members, and about half a dozen friends who are as well (current or former military). All of them were worried about gun rights during the 2008 election, but every one of them has conceded that ultimately nothing has come of it.

Not sure why I spent all that time on it knowing that you're going to wholly disregard my post and/or change the subject without really replying to anything I just wrote, but there you go.

So do you support UN Agenda 21 or not?

(my original question)

What sort of gun do you now own?

Do you really want to get into a discussion of whether or not socialist regimes have all demanded the disarmament of private citizens??

If so you are really going to be embarrassed when presented with the facts.

One thing you overlook in your accessment of the Obama regime is their psyop style 'fast and furious' operation meant to curtail American gun ownership rights.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

McCarthy, is that you?

.

 

[KiffinKiller]

You were right, he didn't answer your questions.

 

[gsvol]

Soros owns controling interest the third or fourth largest
food producer in America and he supports Agenda 21.

It's all about gaining control of food supplies, at least that aspect of the agenda, more broadly it's about world domination.

As Quigley wrote in the '60s, this control is to be administered in a feudalistic manner.

I'm interested in knowing if anyone here does support Agenda 21?

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

If re-elected Obama will be MUCH tougher on gun's. What will he have to lose?

 

[milohimself]

If re-elected Obama will be MUCH tougher on gun's. What will he have to lose?

He would have already done it when the Democrats controlled the white house and both houses of congress. It may have hurt his election chances if he didn't, but on the other side of the same coin, there was no promise of sweeping the legislative branch and the WH again -- in fact, it was highly unlikely.

The window for any serious gun control legislation has already come and gone, and nothing happened.

 

[milohimself]

Soros owns controling interest the third or fourth largest
food producer in America and he supports Agenda 21.

It's all about gaining control of food supplies, at least that aspect of the agenda, more broadly it's about world domination.

As Quigley wrote in the '60s, this control is to be administered in a feudalistic manner.

I'm interested in knowing if anyone here does support Agenda 21?

Does Soros have any stake in Monsanto? They have a far, far larger effect on the food supply in the US than anybody else.

To answer your question from earlier, I received a .38 special from my now-senile grandfather, he used it when he was a bail bondsman in Ohio in the 1970's. He was the only bail bondsman in his county at the time, during which (I'm recalling accounts from my family here) it was illegal to conceal carry there unless a judge wrote a court order that you were in any sort of imminent danger. My grandfather had to fight tooth and nail with local law to conceal carry that gun.

Whatever you think of Agenda 21, there are other things already happening in this country that are a far larger threat, particularly the already present effective monopoly over food supply which is being run by a group that is very much at odds with the UN.

 

[gsvol]

Does Soros have any stake in Monsanto? They have a far, far larger effect on the food supply in the US than anybody else.

To answer your question from earlier, I received a .38 special from my now-senile grandfather, he used it when he was a bail bondsman in Ohio in the 1970's. He was the only bail bondsman in his county at the time, during which (I'm recalling accounts from my family here) it was illegal to conceal carry there unless a judge wrote a court order that you were in any sort of imminent danger. My grandfather had to fight tooth and nail with local law to conceal carry that gun.

Whatever you think of Agenda 21, there are other things already happening in this country that are a far larger threat, particularly the already present effective monopoly over food supply which is being run by a group that is very much at odds with the UN.

Don't know how much if any of Monsanto Soros owns but Monsanto isn't the only kid on the block.

Having said that, Monsanto did lobby for the 'safe foods act' which was terrible legislation imo.

Still though, I think Monsanto et al aren't adverse to Agenda 21, it fits right into building their monopolies worldwide.

How do you come to the conclusion big food companies are at odds with the UN?

As for other bad things going on in this country, our energy policy is foolhardy and will be disastrous for the nation.

I also have a snub nosed .38 special that once belonged to my grandfather.

I got to know a bounty hunter once, he had some really hairy tales to tell.