Romney is .... a dork

#2
#2
Romney has a connection problem. But I wouldn't describe him as a dork. Artificial and white collar is my vote.
 
#3
#3
will reserve judgement until after I've seen if whether or not Romney can throw a baseball from the pitcher's mound to home plate

extra points if he's not wearing granny jeans
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
MG1968 said:
will reserve judgement until after I've seen if whether or not Romney can throw a baseball from the pitcher's mound to home plate

extra points if he's not wearing granny jeans
Click to expand...

Not tucking the jersey when he does it will help the dork factor also
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#6
#6
MG1968 said:
will reserve judgement until after I've seen if whether or not Romney can throw a baseball from the pitcher's mound to home plate

extra points if he's not wearing granny jeans
Click to expand...

There was an article out there the other day about how he does wear mom jeans. Obama is a terrible dresser.
 
#8
#8
Weezy said:
Romney has a connection problem. But I wouldn't describe him as a dork. Artificial and white collar is my vote.
Click to expand...

"Presidential" is the word your looking for Weezy :).......wanna take that bet LG?
 
#9
#9
Weezy said:
Romney has a connection problem. But I wouldn't describe him as a dork. Artificial and white collar is my vote.
Click to expand...


Fair enough. I guess I equate the dork label with artificial.

Remember when he sang? Good grief, that failed miserably.
 
#16
#16
This is sheer stupidity. Anyone casting a vote for the person that they believe has the maturity, intellect, responsibility, and understanding to lead the Executive Branch of the United States should not even concern themselves with whether or not said person appears "cool" or "dorky". Pure, political jackassery.
 
#17
#17
therealUT said:
This is sheer stupidity. Anyone casting a vote for the person that they believe has the maturity, intellect, responsibility, and understanding to lead the Executive Branch of the United States should not even concern themselves with whether or not said person appears "cool" or "dorky". Pure, political jackassery.
Click to expand...

key words here......it is all marketing for far too many ignorant voters
 
#18
#18
therealUT said:
This is sheer stupidity. Anyone casting a vote for the person that they believe has the maturity, intellect, responsibility, and understanding to lead the Executive Branch of the United States should not even concern themselves with whether or not said person appears "cool" or "dorky". Pure, political jackassery.
Click to expand...

Lg.......here is your sign
 
#20
#20
No longer a fight to see who can run the country but be cool while in office. But those candidates who connect with the "people" during the election do have a better shot at getting the younger votes.
 
#21
#21
hohenfelsvol said:
No longer a fight to see who can run the country but be cool while in office. But those candidates who connect with the "people" during the election do have a better shot at getting the younger votes.
Click to expand...

one need only to look to France and see what this attitude gets one
 
#22
#22
therealUT said:
This is sheer stupidity. Anyone casting a vote for the person that they believe has the maturity, intellect, responsibility, and understanding to lead the Executive Branch of the United States should not even concern themselves with whether or not said person appears "cool" or "dorky". Pure, political jackassery.
Click to expand...


Oh, don't misunderstand. I could not care less, personally.

I vote for the person I think will do the best job. I will never meet either of them, so it makes no difference to me.

I do think, however, it matters to those paying less attention, who are less motivated by or interested in politics than us here on this forum, all of whom have strongly held opinions.

The truth is that those on the left and the right have made up their minds. Its the people not even paying attention right now that will decide the election. And they will decide in the last month or so, based on the economy and their personal situations, and things like the debates and commercials.

Romney will have probably have a leg up on commercials with the Super PAC money from the Koch brothers. Obama will have a leg up in the debates because, when they are put side by side and speak, Romney just cannot compete.
 
#23
#23
T-TownVol said:
one need only to look to France and see what this attitude gets one
Click to expand...


? That election was about rejection of austerity measures on the poor and middle class versus placing the burden on big business and the wealthy, not popularity.
 
#24
#24
lawgator1 said:
? That election was about rejection of austerity measures on the poor and middle class versus placing the burden on big business and the wealthy, not popularity.
Click to expand...

and electing the cool guy that dates/marries the super model is what got them to that point
 
#25
#25
lawgator1 said:
I do think, however, it matters to those paying less attention, who are less motivated by or interested in politics than us here on this forum, all of whom have strongly held opinions.
Click to expand...

Which is why universal suffrage fails. Honestly, no non-elected officials in the United States should be voting for the POTUS. Unfortunately, populist politicians discarded that mechanism in the early 19th Century. Now, we seem to always be left with choosing between stooges and rubes.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top