Obviously it too early to look at RPIs but I do think looking at the rankings after one weekend show a huge biased slant toward the northern teams.
From what little I know about the formula I know road wins count almost the same as 2 home wins and with the northern teams playing many more games on the road they will get a huge bump.
Looking at warrennolan website I found this extremely eye opening.
Indiana a team picked by some to go back to Omaha lost 2 of 3 at MTSU this weekend.
Indiana(1-2) now has a 21RPI while MTSU(3-1),who beat lipscomb last night, has an rpi of 97.
How on earth is that possible?
No formula on earth should benefit the road team that much.
Tenn rpi is 197 after winning 2/3 at a neutral site
Seeing this shows me how so many northern teams are getting bids in the NCAA tourney that never used to do so
From what little I know about the formula I know road wins count almost the same as 2 home wins and with the northern teams playing many more games on the road they will get a huge bump.
Looking at warrennolan website I found this extremely eye opening.
Indiana a team picked by some to go back to Omaha lost 2 of 3 at MTSU this weekend.
Indiana(1-2) now has a 21RPI while MTSU(3-1),who beat lipscomb last night, has an rpi of 97.
How on earth is that possible?
No formula on earth should benefit the road team that much.
Tenn rpi is 197 after winning 2/3 at a neutral site
Seeing this shows me how so many northern teams are getting bids in the NCAA tourney that never used to do so