Rumor that Michigan is not invited to Rose Bowl

#1

sickemsmokey10

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
6,777
Likes
2
#1
friend in Michigan said the local radio says that Michigan is not invited and the Rose Bowl will be USC vs. LSU and Louisville vs. Michigan in the Sugar Bowl:lolabove:
 
#12
#12
LSU vs Booty - that would be intersting. I am sure things would be said after knockdowns/sacks.

Although, USC at Rose..tough game.
 
#15
#15
It's about as exciting as Wake Forest and Louisville..

:sick:

I know they score points but I find watching Louisville pretty...boring. And yesterday's acc "championship" game gave me my fill of Wake.
 
#16
#16
Man, if LSU beats USC in the Rose Bowl, we will have to gear up for...

LSU '03 bitch-fest: Round 2
 
#18
#18
I can honestly say I would be much more interested watching LSU USC. Screw traditional matchups, lets see some excitement.
 
#19
#19
USC had a history in the old days of taking down SEC teams in the Rose Bowl. Let's see if it happens again.
 
#20
#20
Doesn't look like LSU will get a chance to smack them around.

The 2003 National Champions will have to settle for Notre Dame, I guess.
 
#21
#21
Doesn't look like LSU will get a chance to smack them around.

The 2003 National Champions will have to settle for Notre Dame, I guess.

I agree all the signs say Mich/USC Rose -- It would be hard for the bowl to turn their back on Big 10.
 
#24
#24
USC had a history in the old days of taking down SEC teams in the Rose Bowl. Let's see if it happens again.

Different era. At the time, you had an SEC team a month after the season ended traveling cross country on trains and horse drawn carriages for what amounted to an exhibition game as all rankings and championships were awarded before the bowl.

The last SEC team to travel to Pasedena was Bama in '46, who, by the way, beat USC 34-14.
 
#25
#25
USC's storied history of taking down SEC teams in the Rose Bowl consists of 2 victories.
 

VN Store



Back
Top