Bottom line....without Tua, Alabama isn't one of the four best teams.
Personally I think OKs win over Baylor is better than any win on Bama’s schedule and that is what should matter. JMO. My biggest issue with the committee is they seem to value close losses (see GA and Bama) more than quality wins (Bama has none).
I do realize that everything posted here is SUBJECTIVE OPINION---but it's all that we have.
Baylor has ZERO quality wins on their schedule to this point!
And they went to triple overtime to beat an unranked TCU team last week.
Baylor in the SEC would have at least 2 losses in the East, 3 if they played in the West.
To wit--Auburn, LSU, Alabama, Florida, UGA are all better teams than Baylor.
OK's only quality win before Baylor was to a Texas team who may finish the season at 7-5.
So--I would argue that OK doesn't have a quality win on their schedule, too!
And they do have a very bad loss to Kansas State on their resume.
Bama may not have a quality win (until they beat Auburn)--but they played No. 1 LSU to a 5 point game--even with all of their mistakes in the game.
I think Florida, UGA, LSU, BAMA, and even AUBURN could all beat OK--they've all played tougher schedules and that's a fact!
I would argue for a 1 loss Oregon or Utah to get the 4th place in the playoff over OK---based on strength of schedule alone.