bamawriter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 26,252
- Likes
- 16,529
Because they didn't change their team identity with Hurts.
And that style of play is NOT going to win them any championships.Nor did they with Tua. There is a difference between what Bama is doing now with Tua and what they did with Wilson, McElroy, and McCarron. There isn't a difference between what they are doing with Tua and what they did with Sims, Coker, and Hurts. The same formations and concepts are there. They just call more pass plays because Tua is a better passer than any of the guys who came before him, and they have one of the greatest combinations of receivers in college history.
It happens to every player, I remember Peyton laying quite a few eggs as well in big games. Running Hurts off for the hotshot young QB has NOT paid off for Alabama, Saban should have stuck with Hurts and took his chances.Lol. Yeah, it happened to be the biggest one of the year and Hurts was laying an egg.
That was one game, Hurts got em there.
Season is not over yet. LSU has big problems defensively, I think Ga will beat them in the SEC championship game and I think both Clemson and OSU will give them problems in the playoffs.
"Running off Hurts"It happens to every player, I remember Peyton laying quite a few eggs as well in big games. Running Hurts off for the hotshot young QB has NOT paid off for Alabama, Saban should have stuck with Hurts and took his chances.
You sound like the bunch around here, never giving Hurts credit when they win and giving him all the blame when they lose. There are many Alabama fans I know that were not happy with the way Alabama lost Hurts. I'm personally glad all the Alabama Tua fans got what they wanted. Every team in the SEC is happy Bama went to a pass 1st offense and left their physical dominating run game!I disagree. Bama's defense got them there. Bama's offensive output tanked starting in November of 2017. Bama lost the Iron Bowl, and thus the SEC, because the offense stagnated. Even the semifinal against Clemson was won thanks to an awesome defensive outing with a middling game from the offense.
Hurts was a great QB at Bama.You sound like the bunch around here, never giving Hurts credit when they win and giving him all the blame when they lose. There are many Alabama fans I know that were not happy with the way Alabama lost Hurts. I'm personally glad all the Alabama Tua fans got what they wanted. Every team in the SEC is happy Bama went to a pass 1st offense and left their physical dominating run game!
Two Freshman competing for the QB position is not the same as a 26-2 veteran starter giving way to a hotshot Freshman."Running off Hurts"
Did Saban force him to leave?
Couldn't Hurts have hung around and competed for the position?
Its ironic you used Peyton. Refresh my memory, what happened to Brandon Stewart?
You sound like the bunch around here, never giving Hurts credit when they win and giving him all the blame when they lose.
There are many Alabama fans I know that were not happy with the way Alabama lost Hurts.
I'm personally glad all the Alabama Tua fans got what they wanted. Every team in the SEC is happy Bama went to a pass 1st offense and left their physical dominating run game!
No troll at all. I believe that Bama would have been better off sticking with their team leader in Hurts rather than giving the reigns to Tua. I said it would cost them last year and it did as they couldn't run the ball at all vs any decent defense and the same thing goes today. NOBODY fears bamas running game any longer and they are a weaker team because of it! That and we hired the best DC they've had in years!They had Burrow last year, shoehorned him into the old identity, and got nowhere. As soon as the adjusted to his strengths, they took off.
Question: are you trying to make a legitimate argument, or is this subtle trolling?
Burrow was basically a Fr last year with hardly any experience at all. LSU will come back to earth next year unless they replace him with a bigtime QB recruit.They had Burrow last year, shoehorned him into the old identity, and got nowhere. As soon as the adjusted to his strengths, they took off.
Question: are you trying to make a legitimate argument, or is this subtle trolling?
No troll at all.
I believe that Bama would have been better off sticking with their team leader in Hurts rather than giving the reigns to Tua. I said it would cost them last year and it did as they couldn't run the ball at all vs any decent defense and the same thing goes today.
NOBODY fears bamas running game any longer and they are a weaker team because of it! That and we hired the best DC they've had in years!