I agree, I don't have any answers for what to do about it but I find it very frustrating when the officiating is that poor. That game could have easily gone to Auburn on poor calls alone, that has huge impacts for teams going forward and their NCAA seeding. Officials have no place in deciding the outcome of ball games. Fans do not pay to listen to the whistle blow. By all means if it is a true foul call it, but at least call it the same on both ends of the floor. Until the last two minutes last night we had wayyyy more foul calls than Auburn and I actually felt they were the more physically aggressive team for 3 quarters and their guards were over the back almost every play.
I also think that they need to re-assess how they do monitor reviews. A play where no call was made on the floor should not be a review-able play, as was the case with KK last night. If it is an unsportsmanlike foul on review, why was it not an offensive foul in live play? I personally don't think fouls should be reviewed at all: in/out of bounds, clock issues, and maybe intentional/flagrant fouls under 2 minutes. I'm tired of them reviewing the play every time a player feigns injury though.
I also think there should be a time limit on monitor review. As someone who likes to attend live games I dread seeing them head to the monitor, sometimes it is 20 or 30 minutes and if they game is nearly over fans will start leaving, I find that sad for the players. If they can't figure it out in under 2 minutes it shouldn't have been reviewed in the first place.
