gsvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 14,179
- Likes
- 11
Sierra Club?s War on Coal Blamed for 53k Lost Jobs in Michigan [Michigan Capitol Confidential]
Here's the Drill [Michigan Capitol Confidential]
The state of Michigan has lost 53,587 jobs 8th
highest in the country due to the Sierra Clubs
campaign to shut down coal factories, according
to a report released by the National Mining Association.
The analysis claims the Sierra Clubs Beyond Coal
campaign, in which the environmental group files a
lawsuit against every coal plant in America seeking a
permit, has cost the country 116,872 permanent jobs
and 1.12 million construction jobs. Michigans job-loss
figure includes both permanent and construction jobs.
Here's the Drill [Michigan Capitol Confidential]
Forbidding directional drilling was bad energy policy
then and it's bad energy policy now. Based on an
analysis prepared by the Senate Fiscal Agency in
2002, continuing the practice would have resulted
in an economic benefit to the state of approximately
$1 billion. Adjusted for the price of oil today, the
economic benefit of tapping Michigan's Great Lakes
reserves would be $3 billion to $4 billion.
State geologists estimate that approximately 30 wells
could be directionally drilled under the Great Lakes.
Directional drilling, also called slant drilling, is performed
at an angle, allowing placement of the well head onshore
rather than on a drilling platform in the lake. While
director of the Department of Environmental Quality in
1996, I was approached by oil companies interested in
exploring for oil and gas under the Great Lakes. After
consulting with then-Gov. John Engler, I asked the
Michigan Environmental Science Board (a group of
scientists mostly from universities with environmental
and natural resource expertise) to examine if directional
drilling under the Great Lakes posed any threat to
natural resources.
The Board concluded: "There is little to no risk of
contamination to the Great Lakes bottom or waters
through releases directly above the bottom hole portion
of directionally drilled wells." The Board went on to
say: "There is, however, a small risk of contamination
at the well head." The board made recommendations
on steps that could be taken to mitigate any impact
to the Great Lakes from the well head, including locating
the wells at least 1,000 feet from the shoreline and
implementing proper waste disposal measures. Before
the ban, eight wells had been directionally drilled
under the Great Lakes without environmental harm.
Even though environmental safeguards recommended
by the Michigan Environmental Science Board were put
in place, the Michigan Legislature still voted to ban
directional drilling under the Great Lakes. The day before
the vote, I received a call from a state senator who
apologized in advance for voting for the ban.
He acknowledged that directional drilling
posed no real environmental threat, but
told me that it was the right "political
vote."
Unfortunately, such actions are all too common among
state and federal legislators who would rather reap the
short-term perceived political benefit of appearing
"green" without taking responsibility for the long-term
damage done to energy supply and jobs.