Silas Redd headed to SC.

#2
#2
USC now has:

A 3,000 yard passer
Two 1,000 yard rushers
Two 1,000 yard receivers

If Kiffin doesn't at least make the title game with this roster, when will he ever?
 
#4
#4
What a joke. I seriously can't wait to see muffins tenure at usc. Hope Al Davis comes back as a ghost to haunt his team haha
 
#6
#6
govols120 said:
USC now has:

A 3,000 yard passer
Two 1,000 yard rushers
Two 1,000 yard receivers

If Kiffin doesn't at least make the title game with this roster, when will he ever?
Click to expand...

You could make a case the D will get better--especially the DL--the next (2) years. At least, we'll begin to have more depth. A lot also depends on these 5* recruits in the secondary coming of age quick.

As for the O, it all depends on these QBs. Two are '11 top 100 players and Browne is a top recruit this year...you would hope at least one will be good :ermm:
 
#17
#17
vol-un-tear said:
Funny what NCAA scolarship reductions get you. This is a joke!
Click to expand...

They appealed them (which schools are allowed to do) so it rolled back (plus they might have found one more loophole, I forget)

Their three years of scholarship reductions don't start until after this season
 
#18
#18
I will say this: since '05, every USC team that's been a title contender has had at least one nonsensical loss to knock themselves out of the title game. If I had to take a stab at that game this year, they play at Utah on a Thursday night in early October, which screams "trap game".
 
#19
#19
govols120 said:
I will say this: since '05, every USC team that's been a title contender has had at least one nonsensical loss to knock themselves out of the title game. If I had to take a stab at that game this year, they play at Utah on a Thursday night in early October, which screams "trap game".
Click to expand...

Or just Oregon could beat them?



But Utah's too early in the schedule for that (and maybe giving them waaaaay too much here)

Seems more like Colorado or Arizona would more be in that appropriate area in the schedule (along with Arizona state and, well, Oregon)


Also, the Thurs night Utah game comes after a bye week, so I'm not sure the Thurs part screams trap as much
 
#20
#20
TrueOrange said:
They appealed them (which schools are allowed to do) so it rolled back (plus they might have found one more loophole, I forget)

Their three years of scholarship reductions don't start until after this season
Click to expand...

10-4. It took the worthless AA about 5 years to finally make the sanctions and 3 years to appeal scolarship reductions? SC committed the Vioations 8 years ago and they have been held from bowl games for 2 years. The AA blows! SC Is a QB injury away from a bad season(like us).
 
#22
#22
vol-un-tear said:
10-4. It took the worthless AA about 5 years to finally make the sanctions and 3 years to appeal scolarship reductions? SC committed the Vioations 8 years ago and they have been held from bowl games for 2 years. The AA blows! SC Is a QB injury away from a bad season(like us).
Click to expand...

The appeal (& possibly a loophole, again cant recall...but i think they did something that rolled it back one year and then they appealed it) only rolled the scholarship penalties back 2 seasons (the NCAA came down before the 2010 season) but yeah more or less I guess


(they can't push it back any further though)
 
#23
#23
I hope that somehow UT and USC meet up in a bowl game so that UT can knock the piss out of them.
 
#24
#24
davethevol said:
I hope that somehow UT and USC meet up in a bowl game so that UT can knock the piss out of them.
Click to expand...

Would have to be either the NC game or an at large BCS game; no other available bowl contract tie-ins

And the at-large option would require USC to be BCS level good, but just miss out on winning the conference - and have that winner not play in the NC - so that they don't end up in the Rose Bowl (and realistically, likely not go to their conference championship game...which I don't know who in that division would be better)

UT could either win the SEC championship or be an at large in that case, though likely the latter might be more beneficial
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top