milohimself
RIP CITY
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48,891
- Likes
- 29
Not really the greatest set of Pac-10 vs. SEC matchups one could hope for... Mismatches in 2 of the 3 games, all of which were down south.
But I noticed on the main board a lot of "Pac-10 sucks" type stuff. Yeah, expected. I picked Tennessee to win and was fully expecting that kind of thing afterwards. It's cool, all the after-game stuff. So since I will get called out at some point (it happens multiple times every week during football season), here it goes...
I know Cal sucked. Watching that team, though, and the way they played there is NO CHANCE IN HELL they will finish in the top half of the Pac-10. Their defense just didn't know how to defend the pass. That kind of thing will get you lit up for 500-600 yards a game in the Pac-10, because every team is capable of doing it. Even as bad as 3-6 in the Pac-10 is possible for the Bears.
Washington State at Auburn... Wazzu looked alright. But what else can you expect? Getting players to Pullman (aka the armpit of the Pacific Northwest) is damn near impossible, and you're AT the place of the team who is the preseason odds-on favorite to win the SEC. So that game is really indicative of nothing.
USC at Arkansas. Upset, huh? No way, buddy. I'm still not sold USC will win the Pac-10, either. Oregon looked highly impressive, even though they were playing Stanford. With UCLA looking good, and Arizona State with the potential to get better (they have the talent, and Koetter can get them back to snuff), the Trojans could still conceivably finish as low as 3rd in the conference.
So... Yep. Cal got blown out, and it turned out to be a simple case of overestimation by the media. None of the three games really changed my opinion on the two conferences in relation to eachother. I still maintain, as always, that the SEC is a better football conference. Hopefully that last statement should dispell a few morons.
There's my deal. No responses coming to any "Pac-10 sucks" comments on the main board, if you want my opinion there it is. You all may resume being the boastful fans that you are. Go Vols
But I noticed on the main board a lot of "Pac-10 sucks" type stuff. Yeah, expected. I picked Tennessee to win and was fully expecting that kind of thing afterwards. It's cool, all the after-game stuff. So since I will get called out at some point (it happens multiple times every week during football season), here it goes...
I know Cal sucked. Watching that team, though, and the way they played there is NO CHANCE IN HELL they will finish in the top half of the Pac-10. Their defense just didn't know how to defend the pass. That kind of thing will get you lit up for 500-600 yards a game in the Pac-10, because every team is capable of doing it. Even as bad as 3-6 in the Pac-10 is possible for the Bears.
Washington State at Auburn... Wazzu looked alright. But what else can you expect? Getting players to Pullman (aka the armpit of the Pacific Northwest) is damn near impossible, and you're AT the place of the team who is the preseason odds-on favorite to win the SEC. So that game is really indicative of nothing.
USC at Arkansas. Upset, huh? No way, buddy. I'm still not sold USC will win the Pac-10, either. Oregon looked highly impressive, even though they were playing Stanford. With UCLA looking good, and Arizona State with the potential to get better (they have the talent, and Koetter can get them back to snuff), the Trojans could still conceivably finish as low as 3rd in the conference.
So... Yep. Cal got blown out, and it turned out to be a simple case of overestimation by the media. None of the three games really changed my opinion on the two conferences in relation to eachother. I still maintain, as always, that the SEC is a better football conference. Hopefully that last statement should dispell a few morons.
There's my deal. No responses coming to any "Pac-10 sucks" comments on the main board, if you want my opinion there it is. You all may resume being the boastful fans that you are. Go Vols