So is Obama responsible?

#1
volinbham

volinbham

VN GURU
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
69,798
Likes
62,527
#1
His drone attacks are apparently creating more terrorists.

He's trashed bankers and Greek protesters killed some bankers.

He spoke out against the AZ law with ridiculous example (ice cream eaters being arrested) and violence occurred in protests.

Now of course I don't buy any of these theories but these are what we heard about Bush (the first point) and about conservative voices leading to violence (the second and third point).

It goes both ways - if killing Muslims in war creates more terrorists the Obama is guilty.

If negative talk about a group is the fuse for any violence against said group (e.g. bankers) then Obama is guilty.

Aren't ridiculous theories fun?
 
#2
#2
Hell, he considers drones comedy material. He is practically spitting in the face of terrorist wannabes.
 
#4
#4
Obama openly states that he supports a national day of prayer...

Someone hears this and says a prayer that the DJIA will take a hit to penalize all the greedy people on Wall Street...

The stock market falls and barely avoids a collapse...

Yep... definitely BO's fault.
 
#5
#5
volinbham said:
His drone attacks are apparently creating more terrorists.

He's trashed bankers and Greek protesters killed some bankers.

He spoke out against the AZ law with ridiculous example (ice cream eaters being arrested) and violence occurred in protests.

Now of course I don't buy any of these theories but these are what we heard about Bush (the first point) and about conservative voices leading to violence (the second and third point).

It goes both ways - if killing Muslims in war creates more terrorists the Obama is guilty.

If negative talk about a group is the fuse for any violence against said group (e.g. bankers) then Obama is guilty.

Aren't ridiculous theories fun?
Click to expand...

Paint Democrat on bomb and it is a good and just bomb. Conversely, all Republican bombs are evil.

Your point is correct. Terrorism promotes itself without the help of Obama or Bush, but the lack of coverage and criticism speaks volumes. If any republican was in office the press would make it seem as if they were running a terrorist camp.
 
#6
#6
Funny how all the terrorist groups became so friendly towards the west after Obama took office because all the hate was centered around one man, Bush.

What? That didn't happen?
 
#7
#7
Obama has a weather machine that caused the flooding in Nashville over the weekend because he hates rich white people.
 
#10
#10
volinbham said:
His drone attacks are apparently creating more terrorists.

He's trashed bankers and Greek protesters killed some bankers.

He spoke out against the AZ law with ridiculous example (ice cream eaters being arrested) and violence occurred in protests.

Now of course I don't buy any of these theories but these are what we heard about Bush (the first point) and about conservative voices leading to violence (the second and third point).

It goes both ways - if killing Muslims in war creates more terrorists the Obama is guilty.

If negative talk about a group is the fuse for any violence against said group (e.g. bankers) then Obama is guilty.

Aren't ridiculous theories fun?
Click to expand...


Yeah, what Obama has said on those subjects compares well to the rhetoric of Limbaugh, Beck, and Palin.

Not even close.
 
#11
#11
droski said:
agreed. clearly the response would have been superior if he wasn't such a racist.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Maybe then he would have at least issued a public statement about the issue. (Which sarcasm of this thread aside has pissed me off.)
 
#12
#12
lawgator1 said:
Yeah, what Obama has said on those subjects compares well to the rhetoric of Limbaugh, Beck, and Palin.

Not even close.
Click to expand...

With regard to bankers it sure is. He's been blasting them since before he took office.

That said, the entire notion that such criticism leads to violence and thus is dangerous criticism is ludicrous - regardless of whose doing the talking.
 
#19
#19
What isn't Obama responsible for?

Wait, the 400-point spike in the stock market yesterday--that's one thing he had nothing to do with. But he was responsible for the plummet on Thursday.
 
#20
#20
A gov't's real impact is over time. Obama's economic philosophies born of a real ignorance of the private sector and how wealth is really created... do not work.
 
#21
#21
Velo Vol said:
What isn't Obama responsible for?

Wait, the 400-point spike in the stock market yesterday--that's one thing he had nothing to do with. But he was responsible for the plummet on Thursday.
Click to expand...

really? someone made that claim?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top