Originally posted by TNVOLS1@Jan 27, 2005 10:12 PM
If Texas deserved to be in the Rose Bowl then Alabama deserved to be in the Sugar and Auburn deserved to be in the Orange. Texas had no business in the Rose Bowl.
Originally posted by milohimself@Jan 28, 2005 9:00 PM
That is reasoning after the fact. After the regular season, there was not ONE good reason to keep Cal out of the Rose Bowl. If any of you can name one besides "Pac-10 sux" I'd be glad to hear it.
Originally posted by vols2345@Jan 28, 2005 9:03 PM
yeah checkerboardcharly, i sont see how cal got screwed over. they didnt beat anybody. i dont remeber them beating one solid team. i remeber them almost losing to orgeon, and bearly makeing it out of southern miss with a win. and while all this was happening texas was clicking on all cylinders. plus i think what happened in the bowl games explained it all. there a good team, but they werent a bcs team.
Originally posted by JSB2277@Jan 28, 2005 6:17 PM
maybe the fact they struggled to beat southern miss?
a team which alabama btw, annihilated
Originally posted by milohimself+Jan 28, 2005 9:27 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (milohimself @ Jan 28, 2005 9:27 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-JSB2277@Jan 28, 2005 6:17 PM
maybe the fact they struggled to beat southern miss?
a team which alabama btw, annihilated