SPECIAL REPORT: Kuwait Readying for War in Gulf?

#1

TVOLS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
1,433
Likes
544
#1
The small oil-rich emirate of Kuwait – situated between Iraq, Iran and an un-enviable geographic hard place on the northern end of the Persian Gulf – has reportedly activated its "Emergency War Plan" as a massive U.S. and European armada is reported heading for the region.

Coming on the heels of Operation Brimstone just a week ago that saw U.S., British and French naval forces participate in war games in the Atlantic Ocean, the object of which was to practice enforcing an eventual blockade on Iran, the joint task force is now headed for the Gulf and what could easily turn into a major confrontation with Iran.


The naval force comprises a U.S. Navy super carrier battle group and is accompanied by an expeditionary carrier battle group, a British Royal Navy carrier battle group and a French nuclear hunter-killer submarine.

Leading the pack is the nuclear-powered carrier, the USS Theodore Roosevelt and its Carrier Strike Group Two; besides its 80-plus combat planes the Roosevelt normally transports, it is carrying an additional load of French Naval Rafale fighter jets from the French carrier Charles de Gaulle, currently in dry dock.


Also reported heading toward Iran is another nuclear-powered carrier, the USS Ronald Reagan and its Carrier Strike Group Seven; the USS Iwo Jima, the Royal Navy aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal and a number of French warships, including the nuclear hunter-killer submarine Amethyste.


Once the naval force arrives in the Gulf region it will be joining two other U.S. naval battle groups already on site: the USS Abraham Lincoln and the USS Peleliu; the Lincoln with its carrier strike group and the latter with an expeditionary strike group.


Telephone calls to the Pentagon were not returned by publication time.


This deployment is the largest naval task force from the United States and allied countries to assemble in the strategic waters of the Persian Gulf since the two Gulf wars.


The object of the naval deployment would be to enforce an eventual blockade on Iran, if as expected by many observers, current negotiations with the Islamic republic over its insistence to pursue enrichment of uranium, allowing it, eventually, to produce nuclear weapons yields no results.


Adding to the volatility is the presence of a major Russian navy deployment affected earlier this year to the eastern Mediterranean comprising the jewel of the Russian fleet, the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov with approximately 50 Su-33 warplanes that have the capacity for mid-air refueling. This means the Russian warplanes could reach the Gulf from the Mediterranean, a distance of some 850 miles and would be forced to fly over Syria (not a problem) but Iraq as well, where the skies are controlled by the U.S. military, and the guided missile heavy cruiser Moskva. The Russian task force is believed to be composed of no less than a dozen warships as well as several submarines.


However, Russia is unlikely to get involved in a military showdown in the Persian Gulf, particularly at this time when it is engaged in a major confrontation with the Republic of Georgia in South Ossetia.


For Iran however, a naval blockade preventing it from importing refined oil would have devastating effects on its economy, virtually crippling the Islamic republic's infrastructure. Although Iran is a major oil producer and exporter, the country lacks refining facilities having to re-import its own oil once refined.


Iran's oil – both the exported crude as well as the returning refined product – passes through the strategic Straits of Hormuz, controlled by Iran on one side and the Sultanate of Oman – a U.S. ally – on the other. The strait is about 30 miles wide at its narrowest point, making it easy to control, but at the same time placing Western naval vessels within easy reach of Iran's Revolutionary Guards fast moving light crafts that could be used by Iranian suicide bombers.


Although Kuwait is on the opposite end of the entrance to the Gulf and the Straits of Hormuz, Kuwait City is less than 60 miles from Iran – and with good reason to worry.


"Kuwait was caught by surprise last time, when Iraqi troops invaded the small emirate and routed the Kuwaiti army in just a few hours," a former U.S. diplomat to Kuwait told the Middle East Times.


SPECIAL REPORT: Kuwait Readying for War in Gulf? - Middle East Times
 
#2
#2
It's almost a month old.Does anyone know if it's true or not?
 
#3
#3
It's almost a month old.Does anyone know if it's true or not?

Given the situation with Iran and Israel right now I would say that these ships are at least on alert for deployment at any time. It would make sense if for no other reason than to try and force Iran to suspend their nuclear program (highly unlikely).
 
#4
#4
We dont have the troops to go to war in Iran. Unless they plan on using the draft, this won't happen. This is another one of the reasons invading Iraq was a mistake.

We invade Iraq because we think they have nuclear weapons when they don't. Iran on the other hand, actually does have nuclear weapons, but we can't do anything because the military is stretched so thin. Another example of the fine leadership by George W.
 
#5
#5
We dont have the troops to go to war in Iran. Unless they plan on using the draft, this won't happen. This is another one of the reasons invading Iraq was a mistake.

We invade Iraq because we think they have nuclear weapons when they don't. Iran on the other hand, actually does have nuclear weapons, but we can't do anything because the military is stretched so thin. Another example of the fine leadership by George W.

I think I actually saw chunks of sky falling on my way to the office.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#6
#6
We dont have the troops to go to war in Iran. Unless they plan on using the draft, this won't happen. This is another one of the reasons invading Iraq was a mistake.

We invade Iraq because we think they have nuclear weapons when they don't. Iran on the other hand, actually does have nuclear weapons, but we can't do anything because the military is stretched so thin. Another example of the fine leadership by George W.

Any war waged in Iran will almost certainly involve few troops on the ground. It will consist of surgical strikes targeting nuclear facilities.
 
#7
#7
We dont have the troops to go to war in Iran. Unless they plan on using the draft, this won't happen. This is another one of the reasons invading Iraq was a mistake.

We invade Iraq because we think they have nuclear weapons when they don't.
Iran on the other hand, actually does have nuclear weapons, but we can't do anything because the military is stretched so thin. Another example of the fine leadership by George W.

See Syria.
 
#9
#9
I think I actually saw chunks of sky falling on my way to the office.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I know I don't post here often, but at this point, I don't see any possible way this situation with Iran and their nuclear program ends favorably.
 
#11
#11
for which side?

Any.

I just have a bad feeling about this one is all. I don't believe an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities is going to be well received.

Not one of those situations where there's a war of words, a couple of rockets are fired, there's a few days of high tension, and then things go back to normal.
 
#13
#13
if it's effective, what does it matter?

Depending on who launches the attack, what will it escalate to? I doubt Iran is going to say "Oh well, we tried."

I'm just wondering what their response will be. This is an issue I could see being a breaking point for them. I don't really consider Iran a stable nation that is focused on peace and getting along with Israel and the West.

I made an edit to my previous post that wasn't there when you replied.
 
#16
#16
Or just maybe its two naval groups being relieved. And since everything that is good and great in the military world is all about joint operations with foreign services this is just par for the course.
 

VN Store



Back
Top