Sports Illustrated Top 20 NCCA Football

[Arclight]

Sports Illustrated Top 20 - Four SEC Teams:

Top 20:

1. Ohio State
2. Notre Dame
3. Texas
4. LSU
5. USC
6. West Virginia
7. Auburn
8. Cal
9. Florida
10. Michigan
11. Georgia
12. Florida State
13. Louisville
14. Oklahoma
15. Clemson
16. Arizona State
17. Miami
18. Nebraska
19. Penn State
20. Oregon

 

[jakez4ut]

ARK was 24...and i have a feeling this may get merged....?

 

[rexvol]

it's hard to stomach that we've fallen behind WV and Oregon

 

[CajunDawg]

it's hard to stomach that we've fallen behind WV and Oregon

Come Jan, you will be ahead of both

 

[Hoosier_Vol]

I don't see Michigan as a top ten team myself.

 

[GAVol]

I don't see Michigan as a top ten team myself.

It's mandated by law that Michgan and Florida must be in all preseason top 10s.

 

[Hoosier_Vol]

It's mandated by law that Michgan and Florida must be in all preseason top 10s.

Very true :flush:

 

[Jasongivm6]

Notre Dame is overrated.

 

[GAVol]

If ND is overrated, we're going to know it fast. Their schedule opens up tough in the first 3 weeks.

 

[Big Orange Diesel]

Texas #3? OOOOVVVVVERRRRAAATTED!

 

[lawgator1]

Florida is, in my opinion as a Gator, overrated this year. We lost another offensive lineman today.

 

[General Jack]

Florida is, in my opinion as a Gator, overrated this year. We lost another offensive lineman today.

On top of a starting guard yesterday?!

 

[OWB]

Florida is, in my opinion as a Gator, overrated this year. We lost another offensive lineman today.

Crazy..hmy:

 

[VolinArizona]

Texas #3? OOOOVVVVVERRRRAAATTED!

Ummmmmmmmmmm, no.

 

[tidwell]

Clemson? Did I miss something with them? Didn't they just lose their best, or one of, QB of all time? Are they planning on overachieving rather than underachieving this season?

Anywho, this must mean SI's College Football Preview issue is coming out this week. Always like reading the page or so devoted to the top 25 plus the extra line or two for everyone else.

 

[VolinArizona]

Clemson? Did I miss something with them? Didn't they just lose their best, or one of, QB of all time? Are they planning on overachieving rather than underachieving this season?

Anywho, this must mean SI's College Football Preview issue is coming out this week. Always like reading the page or so devoted to the top 25 plus the extra line or two for everyone else.

Yeah, losing Whitehurst was big, but Tids, I know you know that one player does not make or break a team.

 

[tidwell]

Sure, but would you go as far as to say the 2006 Clemson team will bring back memories of the 1998 Vols?

 

[VolinArizona]

Sure, but would you go as far as to say the 2006 Clemson team will bring back memories of the 1998 Vols?

Where has anyone said Clemson could win a NT? They are ranked in the top 20!

 

[Mrs.BigOrangeNation]

what in the blue hell is clemson doing in the top 20. I dont think they have a chance in hell at winning the NC as lon as they are in the ACC

 

[CajunDawg]

Clemson losing Whitehurst is probably a good thing for them. He was a solid QB but he really was a terrible leader on the field. He reminds me of Aaron Brooks...put up #'s but could never come through in the clutch.

Still, them being in any Top 10-15 is a little too high.

 

[tidwell]

Where has anyone said Clemson could win a NT? They are ranked in the top 20!

I was just making the comparison of a school losing the best or one the best QBs in their history and one player not making the team, as clearly was the case in 1998 for the Vols.

Plus, they're both orange. Similarities abound.

 

[OWB]

Is there seriously a conversation about Klempson going on?

 

[VolinArizona]

what in the blue hell is clemson doing in the top 20. I dont think they have a chance in hell at winning the NC as lon as they are in the ACC

NOBODY SAID THEY HAD A SHOT AT WINNING A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ZOMG!