Stanford @ Washington

#4
#4
this one is really close! Edge of your seat kinda action. Forrest just returned a punt!!!
 
#5
#5
Based on what I have seen thusfar in this game, Stanford is very overrated(which we prettymuch already knew outside of the USC game). H ope Washington can somehow come through this with a W.
 
#7
#7
engie said:
Based on what I have seen thusfar in this game, Stanford is very overrated(which we prettymuch already knew outside of the USC game). H ope Washington can somehow come through this with a W.
Click to expand...

explain this.
 
#8
#8
005 said:
explain this.
Click to expand...

Everything Stanford has done, outside of winning that one game against USC at home(which was very impressive even with the OL injuries to USC), has been lackluster so far this year. Their D has been good, their O has been anemic(putting it nicely). They escaped San Jose St in week 1 20-17 at home. Washington has dominated them defensively outside of 2 major blown coverages for long completions. Washington is a mid 40s defense...

In looking at those ranked below them(and what I've seen so far), Florida would beat them by 3 TDs. I think they are a #20-25 team.

FWIW, the team I follow is also overrated based on what I have seen thusfar.
 
#9
#9
On 4th & 9 you cant throw it 6 yards to a guy with 2 defenders behind him, bad decision by Price
 
#11
#11
Wonder if Stanford assumed they were gonna let the clock run out and they caught them off guard with that run
 
#12
#12
That or a big breakdown/misread somewhere. Guy only had to beat a couple near the line and he was gone.
 
#13
#13
:yikes:
As soon as Palmer started trying to compare Stanford's front 7 to the elite of the SEC, Washington breaks a long one for the TD. Pollack was having no part of that one! :popcorn:

That is why you don't rush 7... Literally only had to beat the two safeties
 
Last edited:
#17
#17
Was UT's defensive personnel worse than UW's is now, b/c Wilcox seems to be blitzing more than he did when he was here?
 
#18
#18
dreVol said:
Was UT's defensive personnel worse than UW's is now, b/c Wilcox seems to be blitzing more than he did when he was here?
Click to expand...

He had absolutely nothing to work with on D, an atrocious secondary coach, 1 year with an athletic trainer running his DL, and facing a lot of overpowering SEC offenses.
 
#21
#21
dreVol said:
Was UT's defensive personnel worse than UW's is now, b/c Wilcox seems to be blitzing more than he did when he was here?
Click to expand...

We were smaller and less talented than we should have been, had a walk on LB and DEs at DT. I dont think we could do what he wanted to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#23
#23
Man... I guess I just didn't want to believe that we were THAT lacking in talent
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top