madtownvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2014
- Messages
- 6,379
- Likes
- 26,467
First off, I feel really bad for the LVs and the sting that this loss must have. It is a sad note for two excellent seniors to end their careers on. I would have loved to see them play for at least another week.
Mercedes came back for her redshirt senior which she did not have to do. Her commitment to the program needs to be appreciated and admired. When you look at her overall body of work and place on the LV rankings, she qualifies as one of the great LVs even though lacking the trophies.
Nared has been a pleasure to watch over the years. She has had many, many great performances. I look forward to see what she (as well as MR) will do at the next level.
To the stats, here is the glaring one:
The LVs shot5 for 22 from behind the three point arc (an anemic 22.7%)..
When a team goes into a zone, it does not take a coaching genius to figure out how to break it; hit some threes.
The LVs had many wide open looks that went begging.
That poor 22.7% outside shooting was compounded by an equally paltry 33% for 2pt shots. And again, the LVs had a lot of open mid range jumpers and shots at the rim they clanked (and clanked and clanked and clanked).
When they had OSU on the ropes in the first quarter, their 10 point could have easily been double that but they squandered easy opportunities (including missed FTs).
The LVs were not too bad on TOs (8 vs. 13 for OSU) and they out rebounded OSU 39 to 37, though they desperately needed a bigger margin given their abysmal shooting.
Nared, Jackson, and Davis shot a combined 8 for 37 or 21%. In fact, excluding Russell's 10-19 (a really good performance against another quality and slightly bigger post player), the LVs shot 14 for 52 (26%)
Mercedes and Hayes were the only LVs who made any plays with any consistency after the 1st quarter. Green only had 8 minutes but she looked badly over matched and could not provide the boost she did against Liberty (pattern--Green struggles against players who are as big or bigger than her).
The LVs have had losses this season where they just did not show up and others where they played hard but could not hit a basket to save their lives. This game was clearly more a case of the latter. The LV effort was there but the offensive execution killed them. in this game, they needed another player besides MR to generate 15-20 points and they are moving on but sadly, that did not happen.
This loss was not a strictly X and Os matters. If the LVs shot 10 for 22 (which meant they could also press OSU after a made basketball rather than giving off transition buckets), Holly's game plan would have looked just fine.
The fundamental question is what is about the players program that leads to these horrific shooting droughts. Why can't they find ways to get their offensive stars more involved and break out of a stagnant half court offense?
Per those questions, the LVs freshman PGs did not evolve that much over the course of the season. They tended to make the same mistakes against OSU that they did early in the season.
There is a problem in the system.
My guess is that following this loss, Holly will get a one-year extension (that almost has to be done or recruiting is handicapped) but, a one-year extension always signals that the next year is make or break.
But what would constitute a make or a break. I think a repeat of this season (inconsistent conference play and not making the Sweet 16) would probably spell the end.
But, it seems unlikely that the judgment standard for Holly would be a return to the final four. Rather, I think the bare minimum will be a return to the sweet 16 and at least a top 3 finish in the SEC. And meeting those benchmarks won't be easy given the loss of Russel and Nared. Davis has a really good chance of more then filling the Nared void but the post is a big question mark. Green is a good role player but I don't see her being a winning match-up game in and game out. A lot rides on KK improving her fitness and all round game. I hope she is driven to improve.
Michelle Voepel has a good assessment of the state of LV basketball in the broader context of the NCAAW and may comments above are fairly consistent with her take:
Is Tennessee Lady Vols coach Holly Warlick on the hot seat?
Mercedes came back for her redshirt senior which she did not have to do. Her commitment to the program needs to be appreciated and admired. When you look at her overall body of work and place on the LV rankings, she qualifies as one of the great LVs even though lacking the trophies.
Nared has been a pleasure to watch over the years. She has had many, many great performances. I look forward to see what she (as well as MR) will do at the next level.
To the stats, here is the glaring one:
The LVs shot5 for 22 from behind the three point arc (an anemic 22.7%)..
When a team goes into a zone, it does not take a coaching genius to figure out how to break it; hit some threes.
The LVs had many wide open looks that went begging.
That poor 22.7% outside shooting was compounded by an equally paltry 33% for 2pt shots. And again, the LVs had a lot of open mid range jumpers and shots at the rim they clanked (and clanked and clanked and clanked).
When they had OSU on the ropes in the first quarter, their 10 point could have easily been double that but they squandered easy opportunities (including missed FTs).
The LVs were not too bad on TOs (8 vs. 13 for OSU) and they out rebounded OSU 39 to 37, though they desperately needed a bigger margin given their abysmal shooting.
Nared, Jackson, and Davis shot a combined 8 for 37 or 21%. In fact, excluding Russell's 10-19 (a really good performance against another quality and slightly bigger post player), the LVs shot 14 for 52 (26%)
Mercedes and Hayes were the only LVs who made any plays with any consistency after the 1st quarter. Green only had 8 minutes but she looked badly over matched and could not provide the boost she did against Liberty (pattern--Green struggles against players who are as big or bigger than her).
The LVs have had losses this season where they just did not show up and others where they played hard but could not hit a basket to save their lives. This game was clearly more a case of the latter. The LV effort was there but the offensive execution killed them. in this game, they needed another player besides MR to generate 15-20 points and they are moving on but sadly, that did not happen.
This loss was not a strictly X and Os matters. If the LVs shot 10 for 22 (which meant they could also press OSU after a made basketball rather than giving off transition buckets), Holly's game plan would have looked just fine.
The fundamental question is what is about the players program that leads to these horrific shooting droughts. Why can't they find ways to get their offensive stars more involved and break out of a stagnant half court offense?
Per those questions, the LVs freshman PGs did not evolve that much over the course of the season. They tended to make the same mistakes against OSU that they did early in the season.
There is a problem in the system.
My guess is that following this loss, Holly will get a one-year extension (that almost has to be done or recruiting is handicapped) but, a one-year extension always signals that the next year is make or break.
But what would constitute a make or a break. I think a repeat of this season (inconsistent conference play and not making the Sweet 16) would probably spell the end.
But, it seems unlikely that the judgment standard for Holly would be a return to the final four. Rather, I think the bare minimum will be a return to the sweet 16 and at least a top 3 finish in the SEC. And meeting those benchmarks won't be easy given the loss of Russel and Nared. Davis has a really good chance of more then filling the Nared void but the post is a big question mark. Green is a good role player but I don't see her being a winning match-up game in and game out. A lot rides on KK improving her fitness and all round game. I hope she is driven to improve.
Michelle Voepel has a good assessment of the state of LV basketball in the broader context of the NCAAW and may comments above are fairly consistent with her take:
Is Tennessee Lady Vols coach Holly Warlick on the hot seat?
Last edited: