The left and right use fear for the same exact reasons; to win elections and push their agendas.
I am speaking generically from the operating philosophies... not about whether career politicians on either side can be trusted to tell the truth. Very few can.
I would, however, like to see how you would explain away the previous administration's use of fear to justify trampling of our civil liberties; or the way some on the right use fear to justify denying some the right to practice the religion of choice.
If you are talking about using a special judge to approve wiretapping of suspected terrorists then while I am not completely comfortable with it... It is probably necessary with strict oversight from the judiciary and Congress. If you are talking about something else then I'd like more details. Obama has done or tried to do far more to violate our civil liberties in less than 2 years than the previous 3 or 4 administrations combined, ie: fairness doctrine, requirement to purchase insurance, arbitrary confiscation of the wealth of GM stockholders,...
I would also like an example of conservatives using fear to justify denying some the right to practice the religion of choice. And be specific about what is supposedly "feared". Are we talking about outlawing a particular religion? Has direct threats of violence been issued?
It sounds to me that you have a big problem with free speech but no problem with gov't thuggery.
It's wrong no matter which side does it.
No. Some things we are wise to fear and need to warn others about. There is nothing noble about watching someone get run over by a train because you don't want to invoke "fear" by yelling at them.
Big gov't, big business, big labor, big religion, big academia, or any other concentration of power in the hands of a relative few is a direct threat to freedom and security to be feared and held in suspicion.