Strength of Schedule

[Volstorm]

all from collegefootballnews.com

OVERALL SOS:

14 Arkansas 34.57

18 South Carolina 35.37

28 Georgia 36.94

32 Kentucky 38.33

41 Vanderbilt 39.65

43 Tennessee 39.81

47 Ole Miss 41.65

51 Florida 43.31

60 Miss State 45.49

62 Alabama 47.04

64 LSU 47.32

70 Auburn 49.94

 

[Volstorm]

Non conference SOS:

56 South Carolina 57.04

83 Ole Miss 66.42

90 Kentucky 67.75

91 Georgia 68.63

95 Arkansas 71.75

98 Tennessee 72.75

99 Florida 73.42

103 Vanderbilt 75.04

108 LSU 78.17

109 Auburn 78.67

112 Miss State 87.58

115 Alabama 89.25

 

[Vol67]

Who cares since the Big (L)east, Big 10 and Big 12 removed it from BCS.

 

[Volstorm]

Just some stats as to how we stack up nationally. No emotional involvement needed.

 

[allvol]

The actual strength-of-schedule (sos) component was removed from the BCS formula.... but the computers still have sos components integrated within their formulas.

Part of the argument for removing the sos component was that because the computers already included some sort of sos... having the separate sos component in the BCS was redundant? :blink:

Some of the websites for the computers list sos. It might not be a bad idea, if you are a BCS watcher, to keep up with them.

 

[allvol]

Originally posted by TNVOLS1@Aug 17, 2004 12:51 AM
Who cares since the Big (L)east, Big 10 and Big 12 removed it from BCS.

The non-BCS conferences had alot to do with removing the sos too!
As well as having another BCS game added.

I still say they ought to have a playoff instead of the :bs:

 

[U-T]

LSWho is lighting it up