kansas st
purdue
and sadly.....i will explain,.......uga
the first 2 are obvious, but why uga?
uga because that puts lsu at 4 losses. somehow i feel like the committee is saying we both lost 2 games, but they lost to us in a close game and then lost to a 3 loss team while we lost to a 4 loss team. so a uga win will put lsu at 4 losses meaning combined out 2 losses would equal -5 because i think the score caused them to look at it as 2 losses. bama lost to us and lsu. we have 2 losses and lsu 3 losses. our loss was most recent. weird but in a funny way i think this is how the committee is looking at it
if mich were to somehow lose to purdue it def gonna knock either them or ohio st out of the playoff picture
purdue
and sadly.....i will explain,.......uga
the first 2 are obvious, but why uga?
uga because that puts lsu at 4 losses. somehow i feel like the committee is saying we both lost 2 games, but they lost to us in a close game and then lost to a 3 loss team while we lost to a 4 loss team. so a uga win will put lsu at 4 losses meaning combined out 2 losses would equal -5 because i think the score caused them to look at it as 2 losses. bama lost to us and lsu. we have 2 losses and lsu 3 losses. our loss was most recent. weird but in a funny way i think this is how the committee is looking at it
if mich were to somehow lose to purdue it def gonna knock either them or ohio st out of the playoff picture
