Tennessee Current/Past Program Question from a Newbie

#1
HeavenUniversity

HeavenUniversity

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Messages
61
Likes
88
#1
Although I have wanted to go to a game at Neyland for many years, I readily admit I didn’t follow the program much at all until this years Alabama game. And yes, I jumped on the bandwagon—don’t hate me lol. From this site, I have read many posts about the new coach Heupel and past coaches Jones and Pruit. What has changed in the program other than more wins? What were the issues with the earlier coaches—culture, game day coaching, recruiting, relationships with high school coaches, connection with fans?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt and Volanta
#2
#2
HeavenUniversity said:
Although I have wanted to go to a game at Neyland for many years, I readily admit I didn’t follow the program much at all until this years Alabama game. And yes, I jumped on the bandwagon—don’t hate me lol. From this site, I have read many posts about the new coach Heupel and past coaches Jones and Pruit. What has changed in the program other than more wins? What were the issues with the earlier coaches—culture, game day coaching, recruiting, relationships with high school coaches, connection with fans?
Click to expand...
Yes
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckinVol, Alto1, Volfan1000 and 4 others
#3
#3
Well Pruitt had issues with McDonalds bags. But there was not enough wins, culture issues, all of the stuff that goes along with not winning. Dooley and Jones had a bunch of sayings that were just weird. Kiffin left us in the middle of the night after 1 season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woodlawn VOL, Nicovfl8 and Volanta
#5
#5
HeavenUniversity said:
Although I have wanted to go to a game at Neyland for many years, I readily admit I didn’t follow the program much at all until this years Alabama game. And yes, I jumped on the bandwagon—don’t hate me lol. From this site, I have read many posts about the new coach Heupel and past coaches Jones and Pruit. What has changed in the program other than more wins? What were the issues with the earlier coaches—culture, game day coaching, recruiting, relationships with high school coaches, connection with fans?
Click to expand...

university administration making poor choices with hiring of athletic directors and head coaches. Leadership at the top was bad..
 
  • Like
Reactions: distrovol, joevol33, adam.vol and 4 others
#8
#8
Lane Kiffin (2009)

Flaws: Kiffin had a ton of talent and swagger, but he was immature and reckless. He liked to run his mouth, which got him into trouble, and his teams have always seemed to drop at least one big game every year, even now. Honestly, he’s probably better suited as a coordinator than a head coach. His teams just don’t have that consistent discipline.

Downfall: He bailed for USC after one season, proving he was more about chasing the next big job than actually building something at Tennessee. That left the program scrambling to pick up the pieces.

Derek Dooley (2010–2012)

Flaws: Dooley was in way over his head. He came off as a smart, polished guy with an NFL pedigree, but it didn’t translate to wins. He struggled with game-day decisions, had bad hires (especially on defense), and never connected with the players. The whole thing just felt disorganized.

Downfall: Dooley’s teams couldn’t beat anyone decent. He went 0-15 against ranked teams and only won four SEC games total. When Vanderbilt embarrassed Tennessee in 2012, it was clear he wasn’t the guy.

Butch Jones (2013–2017)

Flaws: Butch was a solid recruiter, but his coaching left a lot to be desired. He loved his motivational slogans and gimmicks, but when it came time to make real decisions, he froze. Players had to cover for his mistakes constantly, and he struggled to adapt when things went sideways. His leadership style rubbed people the wrong way, too—he was all talk and no results.

Downfall: Things fell apart fast in 2017. The talent he brought in wasn’t developing, injuries piled up, and the team just looked lost. Going 0-8 in the SEC was the nail in the coffin.

Jeremy Pruitt (2018–2020)

Flaws: Pruitt was a good defensive mind, but he didn’t have what it takes to run a program. He micromanaged everything, which created chaos, and his teams never had a real offensive identity. He also made some dumb decisions off the field, which got the program in trouble. Good recruiter too. If we’re honest CJH benefited from Pruitt’s recruiting.

Downfall: It all caught up to him when the NCAA came sniffing around for recruiting violations. Combine that with an embarrassing offense and too many losses, and it was obvious he wasn’t going to last.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennEddie, Volfan1000, OrangeRev and 1 other person
#9
#9
The last couple of decades we've had a revolving door of leadership. That's changed with Boyd, Plowman, and of course Danny White, who I think is the best AD in the country. I think as long as we have that stability at the top, we'll keep on winning big.
 
#11
#11
Volanta said:
Lane Kiffin (2009)

Flaws: Kiffin had a ton of talent and swagger, but he was immature and reckless. He liked to run his mouth, which got him into trouble, and his teams have always seemed to drop at least one big game every year, even now. Honestly, he’s probably better suited as a coordinator than a head coach. His teams just don’t have that consistent discipline.

Downfall: He bailed for USC after one season, proving he was more about chasing the next big job than actually building something at Tennessee. That left the program scrambling to pick up the pieces.

Derek Dooley (2010–2012)

Flaws: Dooley was in way over his head. He came off as a smart, polished guy with an NFL pedigree, but it didn’t translate to wins. He struggled with game-day decisions, had bad hires (especially on defense), and never connected with the players. The whole thing just felt disorganized.

Downfall: Dooley’s teams couldn’t beat anyone decent. He went 0-15 against ranked teams and only won four SEC games total. When Vanderbilt embarrassed Tennessee in 2012, it was clear he wasn’t the guy.

Butch Jones (2013–2017)

Flaws: Butch was a solid recruiter, but his coaching left a lot to be desired. He loved his motivational slogans and gimmicks, but when it came time to make real decisions, he froze. Players had to cover for his mistakes constantly, and he struggled to adapt when things went sideways. His leadership style rubbed people the wrong way, too—he was all talk and no results.

Downfall: Things fell apart fast in 2017. The talent he brought in wasn’t developing, injuries piled up, and the team just looked lost. Going 0-8 in the SEC was the nail in the coffin.

Jeremy Pruitt (2018–2020)

Flaws: Pruitt was a good defensive mind, but he didn’t have what it takes to run a program. He micromanaged everything, which created chaos, and his teams never had a real offensive identity. He also made some dumb decisions off the field, which got the program in trouble. Good recruiter too. If we’re honest CJH benefited from Pruitt’s recruiting.

Downfall: It all caught up to him when the NCAA came sniffing around for recruiting violations. Combine that with an embarrassing offense and too many losses, and it was obvious he wasn’t going to last.
Click to expand...

He was paying players lol
 
#12
#12
HeavenUniversity said:
Although I have wanted to go to a game at Neyland for many years, I readily admit I didn’t follow the program much at all until this years Alabama game. And yes, I jumped on the bandwagon—don’t hate me lol. From this site, I have read many posts about the new coach Heupel and past coaches Jones and Pruit. What has changed in the program other than more wins? What were the issues with the earlier coaches—culture, game day coaching, recruiting, relationships with high school coaches, connection with fans?
Click to expand...
Got to ask, before you jumped onboard what team did you pull for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange.
#13
#13
HeavenUniversity said:
Although I have wanted to go to a game at Neyland for many years, I readily admit I didn’t follow the program much at all until this years Alabama game. And yes, I jumped on the bandwagon—don’t hate me lol. From this site, I have read many posts about the new coach Heupel and past coaches Jones and Pruit. What has changed in the program other than more wins? What were the issues with the earlier coaches—culture, game day coaching, recruiting, relationships with high school coaches, connection with fans?
Click to expand...

1. Offensive Innovation and Success​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel's up-tempo, high-scoring offense has been a game-changer for Tennessee. Under his leadership, the Vols have become one of the most explosive offenses in college football. Heupel has a proven track record of developing quarterbacks (like Hendon Hooker) and utilizing skill position players to their fullest potential. His system has revitalized Tennessee's offensive identity and made the team competitive at the national level.
  • Lane Kiffin: While Kiffin's offenses were high-powered and effective, his time at Tennessee (2009) was brief (one season), and he left the program under controversial circumstances. His potential was evident, but he didn't have the opportunity to fully implement his vision for the program.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley's offenses were often underwhelming. Despite being an offensive-minded coach, Tennessee's offense struggled during his tenure, ranking near the bottom in many categories.
  • Butch Jones: Jones did have some success on offense, particularly in 2015 when Tennessee's offense was productive, but his teams were not consistently elite. His "no-excuses" approach, while motivational, often lacked the necessary innovation to break into the top tier of SEC offenses.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt, a defensive-minded coach, didn't focus on offense, and that became a major hindrance. His offensive units were often stagnant, and the lack of a consistent, potent offense made Tennessee's struggles even worse.

2. Recruiting and Talent Development​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel has been effective in recruiting both skill players and linemen, assembling one of the most talented rosters in recent Tennessee history. His ability to recruit nationally while also capitalizing on in-state talent has been crucial. His development of players like Hendon Hooker, Jalin Hyatt, and others shows his knack for developing talent.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin recruited well during his time at Tennessee, landing high-profile players like safety Janzen Jackson and running back Bryce Brown, but his tenure was too short to build a sustainable recruiting base.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley struggled to recruit at a high level, especially in the SEC, where recruiting is fiercely competitive. His inability to secure top-tier talent contributed to the program's mediocrity during his time.
  • Butch Jones: Jones had solid recruiting classes, particularly early in his tenure, but his inability to develop those players consistently resulted in underachievement. Recruiting drops toward the end of his time at Tennessee were a major issue.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt was a strong recruiter, particularly in Alabama, but he struggled to develop the players he brought in. Talent was often underutilized or not developed to its full potential.

3. Team Culture and Player Buy-In​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel has instilled a positive, cohesive culture at Tennessee. Players seem to enjoy playing for him, and his high-energy approach fosters a sense of unity and motivation. His leadership style and focus on building strong relationships with players have helped create a winning environment.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin's tenure was marked by instability and dysfunction. While he was a charismatic leader, his abrupt departure and rumored issues with the administration and players created a fractured culture that hindered long-term success.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley's culture-building efforts were ineffective. He failed to connect with players in a meaningful way, and there was a general sense of mediocrity during his tenure, which led to inconsistent performance on the field.
  • Butch Jones: Jones preached a "champions of life" mentality, but that message often fell flat, especially after consecutive seasons of disappointment. Players seemed to buy in initially but grew frustrated with his failure to deliver on the field.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt's tenure was marred by internal issues and a lack of cohesion. Reports of player discipline problems, coaching staff instability, and a general lack of morale plagued his time as head coach. Pruitt was unable to establish a consistent, positive culture.

4. On-Field Performance​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel's success on the field has been impressive. In just his second season, he led Tennessee to 11 wins, including a major bowl victory, and helped restore the Vols to national relevance. His team's ability to compete with the top SEC teams and play an exciting brand of football has won him widespread praise.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin’s 2009 team showed promise, but he left after just one season, so there was no sustained success under his leadership.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley's teams were largely mediocre. He never had a winning season in SEC play, and his tenure was defined by underperformance, especially in big games.
  • Butch Jones: Jones did have some success in his early years, including a 9-4 season and an appearance in the 2016 Citrus Bowl, but his teams failed to take the next step. He never achieved an SEC East title or a major bowl win.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt’s teams were inconsistent, failing to make a bowl game in his last two years. Despite some defensive improvement, Tennessee’s lack of offensive explosiveness and failure to win key games led to his dismissal.

5. Public Perception and Stability​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel is seen as a steady, forward-thinking coach with a clear vision for the future of Tennessee football. His calm, composed demeanor contrasts with the instability of previous coaches, and he’s earned the respect of both players and fans.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin was never able to fully build credibility due to his quick departure. His image was damaged by rumors, his controversial exit to USC, and his inability to follow through on his early promise.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley never generated much excitement from the fanbase. His tenure was often marked by frustration, and his lack of success made him a polarizing figure.
  • Butch Jones: Jones was initially embraced by fans but eventually wore out his welcome due to his inability to elevate the program. His "Champions of Life" slogan became a punchline after Tennessee’s performance failed to match the rhetoric.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt's tenure was marred by off-field issues, including an NCAA investigation and various controversies. The instability surrounding his time at Tennessee damaged his credibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeusExMachina and HeavenUniversity
#17
#17
NO SIR EEE said:

1. Offensive Innovation and Success​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel's up-tempo, high-scoring offense has been a game-changer for Tennessee. Under his leadership, the Vols have become one of the most explosive offenses in college football. Heupel has a proven track record of developing quarterbacks (like Hendon Hooker) and utilizing skill position players to their fullest potential. His system has revitalized Tennessee's offensive identity and made the team competitive at the national level.
  • Lane Kiffin: While Kiffin's offenses were high-powered and effective, his time at Tennessee (2009) was brief (one season), and he left the program under controversial circumstances. His potential was evident, but he didn't have the opportunity to fully implement his vision for the program.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley's offenses were often underwhelming. Despite being an offensive-minded coach, Tennessee's offense struggled during his tenure, ranking near the bottom in many categories.
  • Butch Jones: Jones did have some success on offense, particularly in 2015 when Tennessee's offense was productive, but his teams were not consistently elite. His "no-excuses" approach, while motivational, often lacked the necessary innovation to break into the top tier of SEC offenses.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt, a defensive-minded coach, didn't focus on offense, and that became a major hindrance. His offensive units were often stagnant, and the lack of a consistent, potent offense made Tennessee's struggles even worse.

2. Recruiting and Talent Development​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel has been effective in recruiting both skill players and linemen, assembling one of the most talented rosters in recent Tennessee history. His ability to recruit nationally while also capitalizing on in-state talent has been crucial. His development of players like Hendon Hooker, Jalin Hyatt, and others shows his knack for developing talent.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin recruited well during his time at Tennessee, landing high-profile players like safety Janzen Jackson and running back Bryce Brown, but his tenure was too short to build a sustainable recruiting base.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley struggled to recruit at a high level, especially in the SEC, where recruiting is fiercely competitive. His inability to secure top-tier talent contributed to the program's mediocrity during his time.
  • Butch Jones: Jones had solid recruiting classes, particularly early in his tenure, but his inability to develop those players consistently resulted in underachievement. Recruiting drops toward the end of his time at Tennessee were a major issue.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt was a strong recruiter, particularly in Alabama, but he struggled to develop the players he brought in. Talent was often underutilized or not developed to its full potential.

3. Team Culture and Player Buy-In​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel has instilled a positive, cohesive culture at Tennessee. Players seem to enjoy playing for him, and his high-energy approach fosters a sense of unity and motivation. His leadership style and focus on building strong relationships with players have helped create a winning environment.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin's tenure was marked by instability and dysfunction. While he was a charismatic leader, his abrupt departure and rumored issues with the administration and players created a fractured culture that hindered long-term success.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley's culture-building efforts were ineffective. He failed to connect with players in a meaningful way, and there was a general sense of mediocrity during his tenure, which led to inconsistent performance on the field.
  • Butch Jones: Jones preached a "champions of life" mentality, but that message often fell flat, especially after consecutive seasons of disappointment. Players seemed to buy in initially but grew frustrated with his failure to deliver on the field.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt's tenure was marred by internal issues and a lack of cohesion. Reports of player discipline problems, coaching staff instability, and a general lack of morale plagued his time as head coach. Pruitt was unable to establish a consistent, positive culture.

4. On-Field Performance​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel's success on the field has been impressive. In just his second season, he led Tennessee to 11 wins, including a major bowl victory, and helped restore the Vols to national relevance. His team's ability to compete with the top SEC teams and play an exciting brand of football has won him widespread praise.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin’s 2009 team showed promise, but he left after just one season, so there was no sustained success under his leadership.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley's teams were largely mediocre. He never had a winning season in SEC play, and his tenure was defined by underperformance, especially in big games.
  • Butch Jones: Jones did have some success in his early years, including a 9-4 season and an appearance in the 2016 Citrus Bowl, but his teams failed to take the next step. He never achieved an SEC East title or a major bowl win.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt’s teams were inconsistent, failing to make a bowl game in his last two years. Despite some defensive improvement, Tennessee’s lack of offensive explosiveness and failure to win key games led to his dismissal.

5. Public Perception and Stability​

  • Josh Heupel: Heupel is seen as a steady, forward-thinking coach with a clear vision for the future of Tennessee football. His calm, composed demeanor contrasts with the instability of previous coaches, and he’s earned the respect of both players and fans.
  • Lane Kiffin: Kiffin was never able to fully build credibility due to his quick departure. His image was damaged by rumors, his controversial exit to USC, and his inability to follow through on his early promise.
  • Derek Dooley: Dooley never generated much excitement from the fanbase. His tenure was often marked by frustration, and his lack of success made him a polarizing figure.
  • Butch Jones: Jones was initially embraced by fans but eventually wore out his welcome due to his inability to elevate the program. His "Champions of Life" slogan became a punchline after Tennessee’s performance failed to match the rhetoric.
  • Jeremy Pruitt: Pruitt's tenure was marred by off-field issues, including an NCAA investigation and various controversies. The instability surrounding his time at Tennessee damaged his credibility.
Click to expand...

Outstanding, comparative synopsis. I would add one point: Josh has three credentials that instantaneously win the respect of recruits and his players. He won a national championship as a player, he was an All-American at quarterback, and he was runner-up for the 2000 Heistman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OneVolNation
#18
#18
Volanta said:
Lane Kiffin (2009)

Flaws: Kiffin had a ton of talent and swagger, but he was immature and reckless. He liked to run his mouth, which got him into trouble, and his teams have always seemed to drop at least one big game every year, even now. Honestly, he’s probably better suited as a coordinator than a head coach. His teams just don’t have that consistent discipline.

Downfall: He bailed for USC after one season, proving he was more about chasing the next big job than actually building something at Tennessee. That left the program scrambling to pick up the pieces.

Derek Dooley (2010–2012)

Flaws: Dooley was in way over his head. He came off as a smart, polished guy with an NFL pedigree, but it didn’t translate to wins. He struggled with game-day decisions, had bad hires (especially on defense), and never connected with the players. The whole thing just felt disorganized.

Downfall: Dooley’s teams couldn’t beat anyone decent. He went 0-15 against ranked teams and only won four SEC games total. When Vanderbilt embarrassed Tennessee in 2012, it was clear he wasn’t the guy.

Butch Jones (2013–2017)

Flaws: Butch was a solid recruiter, but his coaching left a lot to be desired. He loved his motivational slogans and gimmicks, but when it came time to make real decisions, he froze. Players had to cover for his mistakes constantly, and he struggled to adapt when things went sideways. His leadership style rubbed people the wrong way, too—he was all talk and no results.

Downfall: Things fell apart fast in 2017. The talent he brought in wasn’t developing, injuries piled up, and the team just looked lost. Going 0-8 in the SEC was the nail in the coffin.

Jeremy Pruitt (2018–2020)

Flaws: Pruitt was a good defensive mind, but he didn’t have what it takes to run a program. He micromanaged everything, which created chaos, and his teams never had a real offensive identity. He also made some dumb decisions off the field, which got the program in trouble. Good recruiter too. If we’re honest CJH benefited from Pruitt’s recruiting.

Downfall: It all caught up to him when the NCAA came sniffing around for recruiting violations. Combine that with an embarrassing offense and too many losses, and it was obvious he wasn’t going to last.
Click to expand...

Very good synopsis of the football program/situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volanta
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top