mudcat1973
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2020
- Messages
- 3,096
- Likes
- 5,610
I would not worry about fouls that might happen I would be more concerned about the ladies playing good defense, limiting turnovers and playing offensively as they have the past two games. The ladies have a legitimate shot at winning against VaTech.tenn raks 216 personal fouls per game 17.5 . does tenn foul more than 215 other teams i do not think so. larry talks about free throws helping va tech win. i say tenn win but do you think tenn fouls more than 215 teams i think tenn does good to get even called game.
tenn raks 216 personal fouls per game 17.5 . does tenn foul more than 215 other teams i do not think so. larry talks about free throws helping va tech win. i say tenn win but do you think tenn fouls more than 215 teams i think tenn does good to get even called game.
Thank you for providing some statistical insight. You answered questions I hadn’t thought.Larry needs to do more research. LVs play at a faster pace than VT.
Foul rate would be more accurate:
LVs Foul Rate 20.7% --- Rank 182 / 361
VT Foul Rate 19.8% --- Rank 129 / 361
Plus he's actually talking about FTs not total fouls:
LVs are #8 nationally in FTs attempted.
VT is #126.
This one is a bit confusing but it actually means that LVs opponents were really good at getting to the line in general and VT's opponents were not:
LVs are #300 in opponent FTs attempted.
VT is #80.
tenn rank #37 in free throws atts 20.42 a game ft % 735 va tect rank of free atts 176 ft % made 554% ncaa.com vols are getting more free throws than va tect 20.42 to 16.48 = 3.94 more for vols than va tect vols shoting 735% to va tect 554% vols shoting 181% better free % vols #37 at getting atts to va tect #137 at getting atts ncaa.com has all the stats for everyteam larry was wrong maybe thats why fanduel said larry free lance take not theirs.Larry needs to do more research. LVs play at a faster pace than VT.
Foul rate would be more accurate:
LVs Foul Rate 20.7% --- Rank 182 / 361
VT Foul Rate 19.8% --- Rank 129 / 361
Plus he's actually talking about FTs not total fouls:
LVs are #8 nationally in FTs attempted.
VT is #126.
This one is a bit confusing but it actually means that LVs opponents were really good at getting to the line in general and VT's opponents were not:
LVs are #300 in opponent FTs attempted.
VT is #80.
Tighten up mud. Serious men’s roundy ball pregaming going on up in here…tenn rank #37 in free throws atts 20.42 a game ft % 735 va tect rank of free atts 176 ft % made 554% ncaa.com vols are getting more free throws than va tect 20.42 to 16.48 = 3.94 more for vols than va tect vols shoting 735% to va tect 554% vols shoting 181% better free % vols #37 at getting atts to va tect #137 at getting atts ncaa.com has all the stats for everyteam larry was wrong maybe thats why fanduel said larry free lance take not theirs.
Sorry, but I am finding this confusing. If LV opponents “were really good at getting to the line in general,” doesn’t this mean that more fouls were called on TN? If that’s true, how did we attempt more free throws? Maybe you could specify whether a lower or higher ranking in the categories is better?Larry needs to do more research. LVs play at a faster pace than VT.
Foul rate would be more accurate:
LVs Foul Rate 20.7% --- Rank 182 / 361
VT Foul Rate 19.8% --- Rank 129 / 361
Plus he's actually talking about FTs not total fouls:
LVs are #8 nationally in FTs attempted.
VT is #126.
This one is a bit confusing but it actually means that LVs opponents were really good at getting to the line in general and VT's opponents were not:
LVs are #300 in opponent FTs attempted.
VT is #80.
Sorry, but I am finding this confusing. If LV opponents “were really good at getting to the line in general,” doesn’t this mean that more fouls were called on TN? If that’s true, how did we attempt more free throws? Maybe you could specify whether a lower or higher ranking in the categories is better?
fouls commit per game tenn rank 216 played 36 games commited 17.5 fouls per game va tect ranked #75 played 33 games commited 502 fouls per game avg 15.2 free atts tenn ranked # 36 free throws made 527 free atts 735 free per game made 20.42 free atts va tect ranks #176 free throws made 409 free throw atts 544 free made per game average 16.48 tenn gets called for fouls 17.5 to va tect 15.2 but tenn ranks 36 to va tect ranks on free atts and tenn avg 20.42 made to va tect made 16.48 tenn gets more fouls 2 per game than va tech but vols made 20 free throws to va tect 16 made per game. and vols ranked #36 to va tech ranked #176 at getting to the free throw. tenn must be better at not fouling in the act of shoting than va tect thats how vols have more fouls called on them but get more free atts than va tect. prove to back up what mudcat trying clear the creek up go to ncaa.com they have each stat listed for all womens d1 team and where they ranked in each stat.Sorry, but I am finding this confusing. If LV opponents “were really good at getting to the line in general,” doesn’t this mean that more fouls were called on TN? If that’s true, how did we attempt more free throws? Maybe you could specify whether a lower or higher ranking in the categories is better?
tenn ranks 36 in free atts to va tect ranks 176 fouls commited tenn ranks 216 fouls commited va tect 75. what the problem is there no in act of shoting fouls or not shoting fouls stats .Our opponents were really good at getting to the line, in general. So over the entire season, not just against the LVs, our opponents were much better at drawing fouls than the teams VT played against.
unconn post who they play next year . tenn not playing unconn next year. never said anything about refs . where did you get refs about unconn and tenn not playing?