milohimself
RIP CITY
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48,891
- Likes
- 31
It seems like he's trying to have it both ways here - hide behind a veil of comedy so he can run a political ad that would be universally criticized if a standard candidate or candidate's PAC ran it.
If it was a bit on his show it would be one thing. Running it as an ad leading up to a primary is another.
I have a mixed opinion on this.
It's hilarious and brilliant. Add to the fact that anyone who views this ad as anything other than satire and votes accordingly then it would reach a whole other level.
Since the South Carolina primary ballot got locked in months ago, Colbert couldn't get on so he implored anybody watching his show in SC to vote for Herman Cain.
I couldn't think of a better use of the citizens united ruling than to wreak havoc on the electoral process through active satire.
The ruling simply opened up the process to this, and he is taking advantage of it.
I understand political cynicism and political satire but I think things are bad enough without a comedian trying to influence the race either for comedy reasons, some experiment or to sabotage a candidate.
I'd feel the same if this was done in the D-primary. The process is already jacked up. This doesn't help.
Looks like a chance to mock Romney disguised as satire to me. If you want to be taken seriously as a satirist then I suggest you go Parker&Stone. That I can live with. Lets really "make fun" of everybody...consistently.