EaglesVols91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 1,664
- Likes
- 2,693
Tell your idiot friends that Cinci beat Vandy last year, Vandy beat UT, and UT beat Cinci, so it proves we all sucked. The difference is Vandy sucks and thinks they don't, the Vols suck but have the tradition and resources to pull out of this tailspin, and Cinci had an excuse, because they play in a weak conference.
Why bring this up? The score speaks for itself. Remember we don't allow moral victories. You don't have a leg to stand on, so just let it go.I'm tired of people saying this. One of my idiot friends just brought it up. Who would win bringing a big east team into neyland battling a healthy darick, hunter and bray? That's like saying Jones would have beat Dooley if it was Cincy vs la tech. Some people need to understand logic.
I don't know about 90%.. Dooley's lack of adjusting to anything, bad game management was enough to keep anyone in it.. It was a safe bet the second half would be a disaster under Dooley...It was the best one game scenario Dooley ever had.
He still had Wilcox and a healthy DaRick, Hunter and Bray. We would have beaten 90% of teams from non power conferences with that scenario.
Well dont get me wrong peeps...but im siked about havin jones here for our coach. ill prolly get flamed for this, but... this is imho and jmo...if jones can't win at least 5 or 6 games then how can we say he is better than dooley? I mean, I want to see jones win at least 7-8 to get vindication for his hiring with at least 1 out of those 8 wins over a good sec team or someone else good like oregon. Also, at least for me... winning the ky and vandy games are a given. if he loses either the ky or vandy game then its unforgivable! im serious too man...for me he HAS to win both the ky and vandy games AT LEAST. am I askin for too much?
I don't know about 90%.. Dooley's lack of adjusting to anything, bad game management was enough to keep anyone in it.. It was a safe bet the second half would be a disaster under Dooley...